Skip to main content

Radrizzani 'has been a good owner at Leeds'

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the accounts of Leeds United. He comments, 'To date Radrizzani has been a good owner at Leeds, buying back the ground and investing significantly more in the squad. However, it remains to be seen whether he is in it for the long-term, if Leeds fail to win promotion, especially given the issues at his company Eleven Sports. Under previous owners Leeds have adopted a very conservative strategy that has made it difficult for the club to compete. They are now spending much more than before, which gives them a better chance, though they are (financially) still way behind clubs with parachute payments. If parachute payments were excluded, Leeds would have the highest revenue in the Championship.'

The club posted a £4.3m loss, compared to a £1.0m profit the previous season, despite revenue growing £6.6m (19%) from £34.1m to £40.7m and profit on player sales doubling from £9m to £18m, due to 'investment in both player registrations and salaries and scouting expenses'.

The main reason for the £6.6m revenue growth was a £5.5m (33%) increase in commercial income to £21.8m (catering, merchandising and the Selby-Warrington boxing fight), though gate receipts also rose £1.1m (11%) to £11.3m. Broadcasting was flat at £7.7m.

Revenue has grown by an impressive £16.3m (67%) in last 3 years from £24.4m to £40.7m, though £5.2m was due to bringing catering back in-house. Other commercial up £5.3m, TV £3.3m and gate receipts £2.5m. There should be a further increase in 2018/19 (higher crowds, merchandising, etc).

Almost all clubs lose money in the Championship with only five profitable, so the Leeds £4m loss is one of the smallest in 2017/18. The loss would have been higher without £18m profit on player sales, mainly arising from Chris Wood’s move to Burnley. This was the third highest in the Championship, only behind the large profits made by two clubs relegated from the Premier League. As Radrizzani explained, 'Unfortunately to sustain a club in this league we need to sell one or two players each year.' 2018/19 will include Ronaldo Vieira to Sampdoria.

Leeds have only made money once in last six years (and that was just £1m in 2016/17), though losses have significantly improved since the £20m reported in 2013/14. Following the investment in Bielsa, his coaching team and the squad, the 2018/19 loss is likely to be much higher.

TV income was flat at £7.7m. Most Championship clubs receive £7-8m TV money, including £2.3m EFL distribution and £4.5m Premier League solidarity payment. Leeds benefited from being shown live 20 times, but the sums involved are not that much: £100k home game, £10k away.

Gate receipts increased £1.1m (11%) to £11.3m, as average attendance grew from 27,698 to 31,521. This was the 2nd highest match day income in Championship, only below Villa £11.8m, and Leeds’ highest for this revenue stream since £11.6m in 2011/12.

Commercial revenue was by far the highest in the Championship. Commercial income rose £5.5m (33%) to £21.8m, comprising merchandising £6.2m (up £0.9m, impact of Merrion Centre store), catering £6.2m (up £1.3m) and other revenue £9.9m (up £3.2m including Selby-Warrington boxing fight).

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 61% to 77%, but this was still one of the lowest in the Championship. This is some achievement, given that over half the clubs in this division have a ratio over 100%.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/