Skip to main content

Should one spend on the stadium or players?

Plymouth chairman Simon Hallett has said investing in a £5m redevelopment of the grandstand at Home Park was the right choice for the club's long-term future. The US-based businessman and his wife Jane put up the cash to support the redevelopment and refurbishment at the stadium.

He said, 'The substantial commitment that my wife Jane and I were prepared to make was only investment in assets that would support Argyle over many seasons, not just through the life of a few player contracts. He added, 'The Board has been very clear, for a number of years, that we want Argyle to be financially sustainable, in the absence of owners who are prepared to fund deficits year after year.' He made his comments in his Boardroom Blog, a good way of communicating with fans, particularly for a chairman who is across the pond: Chairman's chat

Argyle are at risk of relegation from League One, depending on the outcome of their game against Scunthorpe at Home Park next Saturday. In my view, they should be able to do it. I hope so, because of the good work they do on the remote Isles of Scilly.

But is Hallett right in more general terms? It's a real dilemma. You can spend a lot of money on players and they can get injured; turn out not to be as good as advertised by their agent; or fail to fit in with the squad. But you need success on the pitch to fill a stadium. The Pilgrims do have a geographical advantage there given the absence of competition in the vicinity.

Comments

  1. I was expecting some useful insight into the 'football economy'. Very disappointing. Added nothing to the discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How one should divide money up between investment in capital assets (which may not be fully utilised) and players (who may turn out to be wasting asset) seems to me to be a central dilemma for clubs and the answer depends in part on the circumstances and potential of the particular club.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...

Millwall punch above their weight

Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....