Skip to main content

Profits and losses in the Premier League

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has looked at the 2017/18 accounts and cash flow statements of each Premier League club. There is too much to report in detail, but here a few highlights. More can be found on Twitter @SwissRamble.

Arsenal went from £52m operating profit to £42m operating loss, due to lower revenue after failing to qualify for the Champions League, compounded by higher wages and player amortisation plus Wenger pay-off. However, £120m profit on player sales resulted in £70m profit before tax.

Following promotion to the Premier League, Brighton and Hove Albion made £9m operating profit, but a small £3m profit on player sales meant that profit before tax was 'only' £12m. However, that represented a £51m improvement over the £39m loss in the Championship, including £9m promotion payments. Chairman Tony Bloom once again put his hand in his pocket, providing £32m new loans. The owner has provided over £300m in total.

The Chelsea business model has been to run large operating losses (driven by a chunky wage bill), offset by big profits from player trading. 2017/18 was no exception with £47m operating loss more than compensated by £113m profit on player sales, giving £67m profit before tax.

Crystal Palace had the highest loss before tax in the Premier League with £36m, despite achieving a club record revenue of £150m. Investment in the squad saw player amortisation and wages rise £19m, leading to the operating loss widening to £37m. Profit on player sales was only £2m. The £12m operating cash flow was eaten up by £41m on players (purchases £54m, sales £13m), £2m on ground improvements, £3m on tax and £1m on interest payments, leaving a £34m shortfall. The shortfall was funded by £36m of loans: £29m external and £7.5m from the owners.

Everton's operating loss shot up from £12m to £88m, the worst by far in the Premier League, due to £70m increase in player costs (wages and player amortisation) and £15m management changes. Largely offset by £88m profit on player sales, but new stadium costs meant a £13m loss before tax.

Leicester City went from a £56m operating profit to a £34m operating loss, largely due to revenue falling by £74m to £159m, as no repeat of the unprecedented 2016/17 Champions League participation. This was compensated by £38m profit on player sales, thus ending up with £2m profit before tax.

Liverpool's £125m profit before tax is the second highest ever reported in the Premier League, but this was driven by £124m profit on player sales. Operating profit was unchanged at £7m, as £91m revenue growth was absorbed by increases in wages, player amortisation and other expenses.

Manchester City reduced their operating loss from £30m to £22m, mainly thanks to £27m revenue growth. Wage bill was flat, but player amortisation was £13m higher. £39m profit on player sales helped produce a £10m profit before tax.

Manchester United's operating profit dropped from £70m to £26m, mainly due to growth in wages and player amortisation. Relatively low £18m profit on player sales, combined with £18m interest payable, meant £27m profit before tax. Tax bill up from £17m to £63m after change in US corporate tax.

Following promotion, Newcastle United made £18m operating profit, a staggering £108m improvement. This was 4th highest in the Premier League, but low £4m profit on player sales meant that profit before tax was 'only' £23m. However, that was £70m better than the £47m loss in the Championship.

For Tottenham Hotspur, operating profit increased by £43m to £76m, by far the highest in the Premier League (£50m more than 2nd place Manchester United), as revenue was up £71m, while wages and player amortisation only rose £36m. Profit on player sales of £73m helped drive profit before tax to £139m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/