27 consecutive years of profit at Bayern Munich

The Swiss Ramble blogger applies his forensic skills to the 2018/19 accounts of Bayern Munich. Profit before tax increased from €46m to €75m (profit after tax €52m). Revenue (per Bayern’s definition) rose €93m (14%) to €750m including €90m profit on player sales. The board described the figures as 'outstanding', as both revenue and profit set record highs.

Amazingly this is the 27th consecutive year that Bayern have been profitable. In fact, 2019 was the highest profit in the club’s history, both before and after tax. The club has accumulated nearly a quarter of a billion Euros profit in the last 4 years alone (€242m).

Excluding player sales, revenue rose €31m (5%) from €629m to €660m, mainly due to TV, up €34m (20%) to €211m, though commercial was also up €8m (2%) to €357m. On the other hand, match day down €11m (11%) to €92m (partly due to staging two fewer Champions League matches).

Profit on player sales was €62m higher at €90m. The club benefited from €90m profit on player sales, including Hummels to Dortmund, Vidal to Barcelona, Rudy to Schalke and Bernat to PSG. This was their highest ever profit from this activity, but still lower than most other elite clubs, e.g. PSG €145m and Liverpool €140m.

Bayern have become increasingly reliant on player sales with average annual profits rising from just €10m from 2010 to 2013 to €49m in the last 6 years. This season’s profit is much lower (only Sanches & Friedl to date), though the January transfer window is still to come.

Bayern have long been one of the most profitable clubs in Europe, though the riches of the Premier League mean that four English teams reported higher profits than Bayern’s €75m in 2017/18 with Tottenham Hotspur €157m and Liverpool €141m both around twice as much.

Commercial remains the most important revenue stream at the club with 54%, but this has fallen from 60% in 2014, while broadcasting has grown from 22% to 32% in the same period. Match day has also declined from 18% to 14%.

Commercial income grew €8m (2%) to €357m, comprising sponsoring and marketing €197m, merchandising €92m, Allianz Arena €35m and other commercial activities €34m. This means this revenue stream has essentially been flat for the last four years. Already in 2017/18 Bayern lost their place as the most commercially successful club in world football, overtaken by Real Madrid. Barcelona and PSG have almost certainly overtaken them in 2018/19.

Bayern have an excellent kit deal with Adidas (€60m a year), a good shirt sponsorship agreement with Deutsche Telekom €35m, Qatar Airways sleeve sponsor €10m and Allianz stadium naming rights €6m. The total of €111m is more than twice Dortmund’s €50m.

Despite the impressive €31m growth, the gap to the top club by revenue has widened in 2018/19, as Barcelona revenue surged €162m to €852m. Growth also lower than PSG €96m, Juventus €69m, Manchester United €42m and Manchester City €36m, but more than Real Madrid €6m. However, these deals are a fair way below the leading Spanish and English clubs (plus PSG) with Real Madrid earning almost twice as much: Emirates €70m & Adidas €110m (from 2020). No wonder Bayern we’re so disappointed that the mooted €80m deal with BMW was not concluded.

Bayern have earned significantly more revenue (€319m) from European competition than any other German club in the last 5 years. The closest challenger is Dortmund with €195m (i.e. €124m lower), followed by Schalke €118m, Leverkusen €109m and Mönchengladbach €64m.

The wage bill shot up €34m (11%) to €336m, which means that wages have risen by €109m (48%) since 2015. Wages to turnover ratio has steadily risen from 44% to 51% in the last few years. Despite the increase in wages to turnover ratio from 48% to 51%, Bayern have one of the lowest ratios among the leading clubs, only beaten by Tottenham 39% and Real Madrid 48%, but significantly better than the likes of Juventus 66%, Barcelona 59% and Manchester City 59%.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion. Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs. An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog