Skip to main content

27 consecutive years of profit at Bayern Munich

The Swiss Ramble blogger applies his forensic skills to the 2018/19 accounts of Bayern Munich. Profit before tax increased from €46m to €75m (profit after tax €52m). Revenue (per Bayern’s definition) rose €93m (14%) to €750m including €90m profit on player sales. The board described the figures as 'outstanding', as both revenue and profit set record highs.

Amazingly this is the 27th consecutive year that Bayern have been profitable. In fact, 2019 was the highest profit in the club’s history, both before and after tax. The club has accumulated nearly a quarter of a billion Euros profit in the last 4 years alone (€242m).

Excluding player sales, revenue rose €31m (5%) from €629m to €660m, mainly due to TV, up €34m (20%) to €211m, though commercial was also up €8m (2%) to €357m. On the other hand, match day down €11m (11%) to €92m (partly due to staging two fewer Champions League matches).

Profit on player sales was €62m higher at €90m. The club benefited from €90m profit on player sales, including Hummels to Dortmund, Vidal to Barcelona, Rudy to Schalke and Bernat to PSG. This was their highest ever profit from this activity, but still lower than most other elite clubs, e.g. PSG €145m and Liverpool €140m.

Bayern have become increasingly reliant on player sales with average annual profits rising from just €10m from 2010 to 2013 to €49m in the last 6 years. This season’s profit is much lower (only Sanches & Friedl to date), though the January transfer window is still to come.

Bayern have long been one of the most profitable clubs in Europe, though the riches of the Premier League mean that four English teams reported higher profits than Bayern’s €75m in 2017/18 with Tottenham Hotspur €157m and Liverpool €141m both around twice as much.

Commercial remains the most important revenue stream at the club with 54%, but this has fallen from 60% in 2014, while broadcasting has grown from 22% to 32% in the same period. Match day has also declined from 18% to 14%.

Commercial income grew €8m (2%) to €357m, comprising sponsoring and marketing €197m, merchandising €92m, Allianz Arena €35m and other commercial activities €34m. This means this revenue stream has essentially been flat for the last four years. Already in 2017/18 Bayern lost their place as the most commercially successful club in world football, overtaken by Real Madrid. Barcelona and PSG have almost certainly overtaken them in 2018/19.

Bayern have an excellent kit deal with Adidas (€60m a year), a good shirt sponsorship agreement with Deutsche Telekom €35m, Qatar Airways sleeve sponsor €10m and Allianz stadium naming rights €6m. The total of €111m is more than twice Dortmund’s €50m.

Despite the impressive €31m growth, the gap to the top club by revenue has widened in 2018/19, as Barcelona revenue surged €162m to €852m. Growth also lower than PSG €96m, Juventus €69m, Manchester United €42m and Manchester City €36m, but more than Real Madrid €6m. However, these deals are a fair way below the leading Spanish and English clubs (plus PSG) with Real Madrid earning almost twice as much: Emirates €70m & Adidas €110m (from 2020). No wonder Bayern we’re so disappointed that the mooted €80m deal with BMW was not concluded.

Bayern have earned significantly more revenue (€319m) from European competition than any other German club in the last 5 years. The closest challenger is Dortmund with €195m (i.e. €124m lower), followed by Schalke €118m, Leverkusen €109m and Mönchengladbach €64m.

The wage bill shot up €34m (11%) to €336m, which means that wages have risen by €109m (48%) since 2015. Wages to turnover ratio has steadily risen from 44% to 51% in the last few years. Despite the increase in wages to turnover ratio from 48% to 51%, Bayern have one of the lowest ratios among the leading clubs, only beaten by Tottenham 39% and Real Madrid 48%, but significantly better than the likes of Juventus 66%, Barcelona 59% and Manchester City 59%.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/