Skip to main content

A lot to admire about Norwich City's self-sustaining strategy

The authoritative Swiss Ramble blogger reviews the recently published accounts of Norwich City. The club went from a £18.5m profit before tax to a £39.4m loss, as revenue dropped by £28m (45%) from £62m to £34m, mainly due to parachute payments coming to an end, and profit on player sales falling from £48m to just £2m. Loss after tax was £33.9m, due to £6.4m tax credit.

The decrease in revenue was entirely due to the lack of parachute payments, which meant broadcasting income fell £29.1m (75%) from £38.7m to £9.6m. However, commercial rose £1.3m (10%) to £14.4m, while gate receipts were flat at £9.7m. Despite the significant decrease, the club's £34m revenue was still comfortably in the top ten in the Championship, though only around half the level of clubs benefiting from parachute payments.

Revenue has dropped by around two-thirds since relegation from the Premier League from £98m in 2016 to £34m in 2019 (the lowest since 2011), very largely due to lower TV money. This will rebound back to an estimated £136m after promotion, an increase of around £100m. Promotion will be worth around £174m (even if relegated immediately), but worth noting that this is paid over three seasons.

The Swiss Ramble notes, 'The £39m loss is obviously not ideal, but it is pretty much par for the course for promoted clubs, partly due to hefty promotion payments. In 2017/18, the largest losses in the Championship were reported by the three promoted clubs: Wolves £57m, Fulham £45m and Cardiff City £39m.'

Furthermore, the loss was also linked to a decision to keep their talented young players, resulting in very low profit on player sales of just £2m, compared to £48m the previous season (the highest in the Championship), when they sold Maddison, Pritchard and the Murphys.

The Canaries have been profitable in five of the last eight years: they made money in all four seasons in the Premier League, but reported losses in three of the four Championship seasons. The only exception was £18m in 2017/18, due to the significant £48m profit on player sales. In fact, the bottom line has been increasingly influenced by player sales, which averaged an annual profit of £24m over the preceding 4 seasons, either leading to overall profit or lower losses, before the swing back in 2018/19 to the low £2m.

Attendances held up pretty well in the Championship with last season’s average of 26,017 only around a 1,000 (4%) below the 27,000 average in the 2015/16 Premier League with an impressive 20,257 season ticket holders.

After the revenue decline the wages to turnover ratio shot up from 68% to 152%, one of the highest (worst) in the Championship, though clearly impacted by promotion bonuses.

Unlike quite a few Championship clubs, the club had no FFP concerns, as their £24m loss over the 3-year monitoring period was lower than the £39m limit, even before allowable deductions for academy, community and infrastructure (£18m) and promotion bonus (£11m).

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'There is a lot to admire about Norwich City's self-sustaining strategy. Even if they had not been promoted, they could have balanced the books by selling some of their young players. Time will tell whether their lack of spending this summer comes back to haunt them in May.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/