Skip to main content

Juventus strategy is to invest funds in top players

The authoritative Swiss Ramble blogger analyses the accounts of Juventus. The pre-tax loss widened from €10m to €27m (€40m after tax), despite revenue growing €83m (20%) from €411m to €494m and profit from player sales rising €33m (35%) to €127m, due to significant cost growth of €130m. Revenue (club definition) up €117m to record €621m.

All revenue streams increased. Commercial income rose €41m (28%) to €187m (largely the Ronaldo factor); match day was up €14m (25%) to €71m; broadcasting was €6m (3%) higher at €207m; and player loans shot up €22m to €30m.

Revenue has grown by €123m (36%) in three years, mainly on the commercial side €84m, though also growth in match day €27m, player loans €20m and broadcasting €12m. The club's revenue of €494m is by some distance the highest in Italy, around €120m more than the closest challenger, Inter €377m, followed by Roma €236m, Milan €228m, Napoli €185m (2017/18) and Lazio €124m. All other clubs in Serie A have revenue less than €100m.

Juventus have significantly increased the gap against all other Italian clubs. Since 2012 they have grown revenue by over a quarter of a billion (using the Deloitte Money League definition), while the next highest increase is Inter €173m. Milan’s revenue has actually reduced.

Commercial income rose €41m (28%) to €187m, comprising sponsorship and advertising €109m, merchandising €34m & other €44m (including museum and stadium tours). The highest in Italy, just ahead of Inter €183m, then a big gap to Milan €76m, Roma €55m & Napoli €45m. Much of the growth is linked to the arrival of Ronaldo. Club president Andrea Agnelli said, 'He brings us worldwide profile'. Resulted in main sponsorship deals more than doubling from 2019/20: Adidas from €23m to €51m (and paid €15m bonus in 18/19), Jeep from €17m to €42m.

The increases in Juventus sponsorship deals are necessary if they want to financially compete with the leading clubs in Spain, England, Germany and France, as their commercial income is much higher, e.g. five clubs were well above €300m in the 2017/18 Money League.

Notwithstanding the Ronaldo effect, the Swiss Ramble notes, 'It is imperative that Juventus do well in the Champions League to boost their broadcasting income, as the TV rights in Serie A are relatively low. Indeed, in 2019/20 there are big increases in England, Spain and France, while Italy is unchanged.'

Juventus saw large cost growth: wages increased €69m (27%) from €259m to €328m, player amortisation grew €42m (39%) from €107m to €149m, while other expenses were up €6m to €130m. It also cost the club €15m to pay-off Allegri and his staff.

The wage bill shot up €69m (27%) from €259m to €328m, mainly due to Ronaldo’s arrival plus the renewal of some player contracts. Thanks to the revenue growth, they managed to restrict the increase in the wages to turnover ratio from 63% to 66%. Wages have grown by €106m (48%) in the last three years, which is much more than other Italian clubs The wages to turnover ratio is, however, mid-table in Italy.

The €27m loss before tax is the third worst in Italy, only surpassed by Inter €40m and Milan’s awful €143m. Just over half the clubs in Serie A lose money. The most profitable are Atalanta €35m, Sampdoria €19m & Sassuolo €13m.

So after four years of profits, Juventus have now reported losses for two years in a row. However, the club is no stranger to losses, having racked up €151m in the three years between 2011 and 2013. They currently forecast that 2019/20 will end up in another loss.

The profit on player sales is increasingly important for Juventus averaging €120m a year over last three years. Excluding this activity, 2018/19 loss would have been €154m.

Based on the Swiss Ramble's estimate, Juventus earned €91m from the Champions League after going out in the quarter-finals, much higher than the prior season’s €80m, due to the new 2018/19 deal and distribution method. Other Italian clubs: Roma €55m, Napoli €47m and Inter €46m.

The Champions League is extremely important for Juventus, who have earned an impressive €447m from it in last five seasons. Not only is this much higher than other Italian clubs (Roma €282m, Napoli €185m, Inter €67m), but the most in Europe (next highest Real Madrid €383m).

Gross financial debt increased from €329m to €473m, including a €175m bond issue in 2019, as well as amounts owed to factoring companies €180m, bank loans €87m and Istituto per il Credito Sportivo €31m. This debt has almost quadrupled since €124m in 2011. The gross debt of €473m is the highest in Italy, just ahead of Inter €436m (Goldman Sachs financing).

Much of Juventus debt was down to funding required for their new stadium development, but is increasingly to finance investment in the squad. Using the broadest possible definition of debt, Juventus total liabilities of €911m are one of the highest amounts owed in Europe, only behind Barcelona €1.2 bln, Manchester United €1.2 bn and Tottenham Hotspur €1.1 bn.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'The Juventus strategy is to invest funds in top players to drive success on the pitch to increase revenue, as exemplified by the purchase of Cristiano Ronaldo. This will require good progress in the Champions League (or they need profitable player sales) to cover growing debts.'

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more