Skip to main content

Juventus strategy is to invest funds in top players

The authoritative Swiss Ramble blogger analyses the accounts of Juventus. The pre-tax loss widened from €10m to €27m (€40m after tax), despite revenue growing €83m (20%) from €411m to €494m and profit from player sales rising €33m (35%) to €127m, due to significant cost growth of €130m. Revenue (club definition) up €117m to record €621m.

All revenue streams increased. Commercial income rose €41m (28%) to €187m (largely the Ronaldo factor); match day was up €14m (25%) to €71m; broadcasting was €6m (3%) higher at €207m; and player loans shot up €22m to €30m.

Revenue has grown by €123m (36%) in three years, mainly on the commercial side €84m, though also growth in match day €27m, player loans €20m and broadcasting €12m. The club's revenue of €494m is by some distance the highest in Italy, around €120m more than the closest challenger, Inter €377m, followed by Roma €236m, Milan €228m, Napoli €185m (2017/18) and Lazio €124m. All other clubs in Serie A have revenue less than €100m.

Juventus have significantly increased the gap against all other Italian clubs. Since 2012 they have grown revenue by over a quarter of a billion (using the Deloitte Money League definition), while the next highest increase is Inter €173m. Milan’s revenue has actually reduced.

Commercial income rose €41m (28%) to €187m, comprising sponsorship and advertising €109m, merchandising €34m & other €44m (including museum and stadium tours). The highest in Italy, just ahead of Inter €183m, then a big gap to Milan €76m, Roma €55m & Napoli €45m. Much of the growth is linked to the arrival of Ronaldo. Club president Andrea Agnelli said, 'He brings us worldwide profile'. Resulted in main sponsorship deals more than doubling from 2019/20: Adidas from €23m to €51m (and paid €15m bonus in 18/19), Jeep from €17m to €42m.

The increases in Juventus sponsorship deals are necessary if they want to financially compete with the leading clubs in Spain, England, Germany and France, as their commercial income is much higher, e.g. five clubs were well above €300m in the 2017/18 Money League.

Notwithstanding the Ronaldo effect, the Swiss Ramble notes, 'It is imperative that Juventus do well in the Champions League to boost their broadcasting income, as the TV rights in Serie A are relatively low. Indeed, in 2019/20 there are big increases in England, Spain and France, while Italy is unchanged.'

Juventus saw large cost growth: wages increased €69m (27%) from €259m to €328m, player amortisation grew €42m (39%) from €107m to €149m, while other expenses were up €6m to €130m. It also cost the club €15m to pay-off Allegri and his staff.

The wage bill shot up €69m (27%) from €259m to €328m, mainly due to Ronaldo’s arrival plus the renewal of some player contracts. Thanks to the revenue growth, they managed to restrict the increase in the wages to turnover ratio from 63% to 66%. Wages have grown by €106m (48%) in the last three years, which is much more than other Italian clubs The wages to turnover ratio is, however, mid-table in Italy.

The €27m loss before tax is the third worst in Italy, only surpassed by Inter €40m and Milan’s awful €143m. Just over half the clubs in Serie A lose money. The most profitable are Atalanta €35m, Sampdoria €19m & Sassuolo €13m.

So after four years of profits, Juventus have now reported losses for two years in a row. However, the club is no stranger to losses, having racked up €151m in the three years between 2011 and 2013. They currently forecast that 2019/20 will end up in another loss.

The profit on player sales is increasingly important for Juventus averaging €120m a year over last three years. Excluding this activity, 2018/19 loss would have been €154m.

Based on the Swiss Ramble's estimate, Juventus earned €91m from the Champions League after going out in the quarter-finals, much higher than the prior season’s €80m, due to the new 2018/19 deal and distribution method. Other Italian clubs: Roma €55m, Napoli €47m and Inter €46m.

The Champions League is extremely important for Juventus, who have earned an impressive €447m from it in last five seasons. Not only is this much higher than other Italian clubs (Roma €282m, Napoli €185m, Inter €67m), but the most in Europe (next highest Real Madrid €383m).

Gross financial debt increased from €329m to €473m, including a €175m bond issue in 2019, as well as amounts owed to factoring companies €180m, bank loans €87m and Istituto per il Credito Sportivo €31m. This debt has almost quadrupled since €124m in 2011. The gross debt of €473m is the highest in Italy, just ahead of Inter €436m (Goldman Sachs financing).

Much of Juventus debt was down to funding required for their new stadium development, but is increasingly to finance investment in the squad. Using the broadest possible definition of debt, Juventus total liabilities of €911m are one of the highest amounts owed in Europe, only behind Barcelona €1.2 bln, Manchester United €1.2 bn and Tottenham Hotspur €1.1 bn.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'The Juventus strategy is to invest funds in top players to drive success on the pitch to increase revenue, as exemplified by the purchase of Cristiano Ronaldo. This will require good progress in the Champions League (or they need profitable player sales) to cover growing debts.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/