Skip to main content

Millwall reduces losses

The authoritative Swiss Ramble looks at Millwall's financial results for 2018/19. They achieved 'the best result for many years' by reducing their loss from £5.0m to just £0.7m, as revenue increased by £2.8m (18%) to £18.4m and profit on player sales and loans rose by £6.9m, partially offset by £5.6m growth in expenses.

The loss of £0.7m was one of the better financial performances in the Championship. As Finance Director Mark Fairbrother observed, no club in this division is consistently profitable. No fewer than nine clubs posted losses above £20m.

Millwall have lost £61m in the last 10 years, though the losses have been falling – from £12m in 2015 to £1m in 2019. However, this season’s figure will be adversely affected by lower player sales and higher wages, and may not have a financially rewarding cup run like 18/19.

Millwall's revenue increase was largely driven by broadcasting income, up £2.4m (32%) to £10.0m, partly reflecting televised cup games, though commercial also rose £0.4m (16%) to £2.7m. Match day was “static” at £5.6m.

Revenue has grown by £8.4m (84%) in the two years since promotion from League One, rising from £10.0m to £18.4m. This is mainly due to TV money, up £7.3m, with smaller increases in commercial £0.6m and match day £0.5m. Despite the growth, Millwall's £18m revenue is still one of the smallest in the Championship, though they have overtaken Reading and Ipswich Town. However, it was only around a quarter of Aston Villa £69m, Sunderland £64m and Middlesbrough £62m (2017/18 figures).

The bottom line benefited from £5.4m profit on player sales (plus £1.5m player loans), compared to £10k loss the previous season, due to the lucrative transfer of George Saville to Middlesbrough. Still a lot lower than Bristol City’s amazing £38m profit from this activity. Millwall have rarely made big money from player sales. In fact, the £5.4m profit reported in 2018/19 from Saville’s sale to Middlesbrough is as much as the previous 13 years combined, when the highest year was £1.7m in 2011, mainly Steve Morison’s move to Norwich City.

Attendance increased from 13,376 to 13,635. Crowds are obviously higher in the Championship than League One, but it is worth noting that the current average is actually the highest since they enjoyed a brief period in the top flight (old Division One) in the late 80s. Even so, attendance was still one of the lowest in the Championship, only above Wigan, Brentford, Rotherham and Hull City. To give some idea of the strength of competition, 12 clubs had crowds of 20,000 or more. Season ticket prices have been frozen for six years.

The wage bill rose by £3.5m (26%) from £13.4m to £16.9m. The wages to turnover ratio increased from 86% to 92%, which is not great, but is actually among the lowest (best) in the Championship. In fact, more than half the clubs in this ultra-competitive division have ratios over 100% with Birmingham 202% 'leading the way'.

The gross debt was unchanged at £10m of loan notes, where repayment has been extended again to July 2021. This would be around £30m higher without the owners Chestnut Hill Ventures (CHV) effectively writing-off debt by waiving interest and converting loans into equity. £10m gross debt is very small compared to many other clubs in the Championship who have much larger debts, e.g. Boro £101m and Ipswich Town £95m. The debt at these clubs is normally not an issue – so long as the owners continue to provide support.

Millwall's stated objective is 'to take steps to enable the club to become an established Championship side', though they are 'not going to be throwing money at it'. That said, it looks like Berylson will have to continue funding the club’s losses for the foreseeable future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/