Skip to main content

Does club dominance matter?

Bill Shankly was once asked what was the greatest team in the world? His answer was, of course, Liverpool. And what is the second greatest team? Liverpool Reserves. If that was the case, the resultant league would be rather strange.

Liverpool fans are justifiably celebrating the excellence of their current team. But is the dominance of Liverpool and Manchester City good for the game as a whole? Or does it make the Premier League 'product' less attractive?

Tony Cascarino argues in The Times this morning that the Premier League is increasingly looking like Scotland ten years ago when Celtic and Rangers were dominant - and arguably that became boring except for the fans of these two clubs. (As it so happens, Celtic and Rangers are currently well ahead of the third placed club, so perhaps the natural order north of the border is being restored).

Cascarino argues: 'We are blinded by the long-established view that the Premier League is the hardest and most competitive league in the world. It is actually one of the easiest.'

Cascarino somewhat controversially continues: 'The table has a slightly artificial look, with City only two points ahead of Leicester having lost some bad games earlier in the season. But the gulf between City and Liverpool and the rest is enormous - as they showed last season as well. Unless something drastic happens, there will only be two winners of this league for the next five years.'

Of course, one could argue that both Arsenal and Manchester United are going through long and painful transitions. Chelsea are still in the mix, while Tottenham Hotspur have been hit by injuries. But you can see where Cascarino is coming from.

But does it matter in terms of the attractiveness of the competition as a whole? There is a literature on this, albeit much of it concerned with whether football falls foul of competition law (probably yes, as a cartel, but it usually can negotiate a way out).

In Spain Barcelona and Real Madrid have dominated La Liga (they currently occupy the top two places). But has it hit the global appeal of Spanish football? Probably rather the contrary. 'Followers' want to see world class players competing against each other which is why some top clubs keep pushing for a European Super League. Whether that is good for the average fan who goes to matches is another matter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...