Skip to main content

Does club dominance matter?

Bill Shankly was once asked what was the greatest team in the world? His answer was, of course, Liverpool. And what is the second greatest team? Liverpool Reserves. If that was the case, the resultant league would be rather strange.

Liverpool fans are justifiably celebrating the excellence of their current team. But is the dominance of Liverpool and Manchester City good for the game as a whole? Or does it make the Premier League 'product' less attractive?

Tony Cascarino argues in The Times this morning that the Premier League is increasingly looking like Scotland ten years ago when Celtic and Rangers were dominant - and arguably that became boring except for the fans of these two clubs. (As it so happens, Celtic and Rangers are currently well ahead of the third placed club, so perhaps the natural order north of the border is being restored).

Cascarino argues: 'We are blinded by the long-established view that the Premier League is the hardest and most competitive league in the world. It is actually one of the easiest.'

Cascarino somewhat controversially continues: 'The table has a slightly artificial look, with City only two points ahead of Leicester having lost some bad games earlier in the season. But the gulf between City and Liverpool and the rest is enormous - as they showed last season as well. Unless something drastic happens, there will only be two winners of this league for the next five years.'

Of course, one could argue that both Arsenal and Manchester United are going through long and painful transitions. Chelsea are still in the mix, while Tottenham Hotspur have been hit by injuries. But you can see where Cascarino is coming from.

But does it matter in terms of the attractiveness of the competition as a whole? There is a literature on this, albeit much of it concerned with whether football falls foul of competition law (probably yes, as a cartel, but it usually can negotiate a way out).

In Spain Barcelona and Real Madrid have dominated La Liga (they currently occupy the top two places). But has it hit the global appeal of Spanish football? Probably rather the contrary. 'Followers' want to see world class players competing against each other which is why some top clubs keep pushing for a European Super League. Whether that is good for the average fan who goes to matches is another matter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/