Skip to main content

Everton's loss fourth worst ever in Premier League

Everton's accounts for 2018/19 cover a thirteen month period which does impact on the bottom line. Writing from Zurich, the authoritative Swiss Ramble subjects them to his usual forensic analysis.

He notes, 'Everton's £112m loss is the highest reported to date in the 2018/19 Premier League, though Chelsea also suffered a deficit over £100m. This was significantly more than the worst reported in 2017/18 (Crystal Palace £36m). Both Manchester clubs posted profits.'

The loss is actually the fourth worst ever posted in the Premier League, though a long way below Manchester City £198m in 2010/11. Chief Executive Denise Barrett-Baxendale observed, 'These results reflect our position in the early stages of a long-term investment cycle.' [WG: Well, I suppose that is one way of putting a gloss on it. 'Investments' in players generate uncertain returns.]

Indeed, the Swiss Ramble notes: 'Everton could have reduced the loss with more player sales, but they looked to retain their key talent. As a result, profit on player sales fell from £88m to £20m, mainly Davy Klaassen to Werder Bremen and Funes Mori to Villarreal. Prior season included Lukaku, Barkley and Deulofeu.'

Even so, the club have increasingly relied on profit from player sales, which has averaged £53m a season over the last 3 years, compared to just £14m in preceding 7 years. Should also be fairly high in 2019/20, due to sales of Gueye, Lookman, Vlasic and Onyekuru. [WG: This is a trend that has been noted across many leading European clubs, and it is risky].

The club have made more money from player sales in the last six years (£199m) than Arsenal £177m, Manchester City £147m and Manchester United £76m. However, they will probably need to adopt this as a regular part of their business model to achieve sustainability in the short-term. [WG: This may conflict with football objectives].

If the club was a normal business rather than a football club the cumulative losses would be worrying. The Swiss Ramble reports, '[the club] have reported losses four times in last five seasons with the sole exception being £31m profit in 2017. Total deficit over this period was £123m, but £112m of this in last season. In 14 years since 2005, club has only been profitable four times – and 2008 was just £26k.'

In spite of the losses, the £188m revenue is 54% (£66m) higher than £122m reported just 3 years ago. Vast majority of the growth (£50m) is due to higher Premier League TV deal, though commercial is also up £19m. Note: if outsourced catering/retail were included, revenue would be £7m higher at £195m.

Everton consider with some historical justification that they should be a top six club. The Swiss Ramble points out: 'Despite Everton's £188m revenue being the second highest in the club’s history, there remains a huge disparity with the “Big Six”, where the lowest revenue (Arsnal £393m) is more than twice as much, while Manchester United £627m is around £440m higher. Also overtaken by West Ham United £191m last season.'

2018/19 revenue suffered a €14m reduction after failing to qualify for the Europa League, about which CFO Sasha Ryazantsev said, 'demonstrated why regular European football is so important for us financially'. CEO Barrett-Baxendale noted, 'Significant revenue from regular Champions League football creates considerable financial barriers to entry.' The earnings over the last five years reinforce her point, e.g. Manchester City €337m, Liverpool €264m and Spurs €236m, compared to Everton’s €22m.

Since 2013 the club's commercial income has more than tripled from £13m to £41m, but the absolute growth of only £28m means that the gap to the leading clubs has actually widened. In the same period, the Big Six have all grown by £84-123m (except Arsenal £48m).

Average attendance of around 39,000 was the ninth highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by the Big Six plus West Ham (Olympic Stadium) and Newcastle United. Season tickets have reached the cap with more than 10,000 on the waiting list.

The wage bill rose almost £15m (10%) to £160m, due to significant investment in the squad, despite number of players and management falling from 172 to 151, with wages to turnover ratio worsening from 77% to 85%. Wages are up by incredible £76m (90%) from £84m in last three years. [WG: Do Everton fans think value for money has been achieved?]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Spurs CEO attacks luxury training base

The Tottenham Hotspur chief executive Vinai Venkatesham has issued a withering assessment of the way the club was run under Daniel Levy, likening the state-of-the-art training centre to a five-star hotel rather than a centre of high performance.  Venkatesham was appointed to his role in April 2025, having stepped down as chief executive at Arsenal the previous summer. However, he has said that some aspects of the club were “in a significantly worse state” than he expected.  “Our training centre is amazing, one of the best, if not the best in the world,” Venkatesham told BBC Sport. “But when you look around, it looks more like a five-star hotel than it does a performance environment. That will change over the summer. I think there are many areas where the club hasn’t got the right level of expertise.”  He explained that the football side of operations was the club’s main downfall when he arrived last year. [One Spurs fan wryly observed that it was like a water company sayi...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...