Skip to main content

Everton's loss fourth worst ever in Premier League

Everton's accounts for 2018/19 cover a thirteen month period which does impact on the bottom line. Writing from Zurich, the authoritative Swiss Ramble subjects them to his usual forensic analysis.

He notes, 'Everton's £112m loss is the highest reported to date in the 2018/19 Premier League, though Chelsea also suffered a deficit over £100m. This was significantly more than the worst reported in 2017/18 (Crystal Palace £36m). Both Manchester clubs posted profits.'

The loss is actually the fourth worst ever posted in the Premier League, though a long way below Manchester City £198m in 2010/11. Chief Executive Denise Barrett-Baxendale observed, 'These results reflect our position in the early stages of a long-term investment cycle.' [WG: Well, I suppose that is one way of putting a gloss on it. 'Investments' in players generate uncertain returns.]

Indeed, the Swiss Ramble notes: 'Everton could have reduced the loss with more player sales, but they looked to retain their key talent. As a result, profit on player sales fell from £88m to £20m, mainly Davy Klaassen to Werder Bremen and Funes Mori to Villarreal. Prior season included Lukaku, Barkley and Deulofeu.'

Even so, the club have increasingly relied on profit from player sales, which has averaged £53m a season over the last 3 years, compared to just £14m in preceding 7 years. Should also be fairly high in 2019/20, due to sales of Gueye, Lookman, Vlasic and Onyekuru. [WG: This is a trend that has been noted across many leading European clubs, and it is risky].

The club have made more money from player sales in the last six years (£199m) than Arsenal £177m, Manchester City £147m and Manchester United £76m. However, they will probably need to adopt this as a regular part of their business model to achieve sustainability in the short-term. [WG: This may conflict with football objectives].

If the club was a normal business rather than a football club the cumulative losses would be worrying. The Swiss Ramble reports, '[the club] have reported losses four times in last five seasons with the sole exception being £31m profit in 2017. Total deficit over this period was £123m, but £112m of this in last season. In 14 years since 2005, club has only been profitable four times – and 2008 was just £26k.'

In spite of the losses, the £188m revenue is 54% (£66m) higher than £122m reported just 3 years ago. Vast majority of the growth (£50m) is due to higher Premier League TV deal, though commercial is also up £19m. Note: if outsourced catering/retail were included, revenue would be £7m higher at £195m.

Everton consider with some historical justification that they should be a top six club. The Swiss Ramble points out: 'Despite Everton's £188m revenue being the second highest in the club’s history, there remains a huge disparity with the “Big Six”, where the lowest revenue (Arsnal £393m) is more than twice as much, while Manchester United £627m is around £440m higher. Also overtaken by West Ham United £191m last season.'

2018/19 revenue suffered a €14m reduction after failing to qualify for the Europa League, about which CFO Sasha Ryazantsev said, 'demonstrated why regular European football is so important for us financially'. CEO Barrett-Baxendale noted, 'Significant revenue from regular Champions League football creates considerable financial barriers to entry.' The earnings over the last five years reinforce her point, e.g. Manchester City €337m, Liverpool €264m and Spurs €236m, compared to Everton’s €22m.

Since 2013 the club's commercial income has more than tripled from £13m to £41m, but the absolute growth of only £28m means that the gap to the leading clubs has actually widened. In the same period, the Big Six have all grown by £84-123m (except Arsenal £48m).

Average attendance of around 39,000 was the ninth highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by the Big Six plus West Ham (Olympic Stadium) and Newcastle United. Season tickets have reached the cap with more than 10,000 on the waiting list.

The wage bill rose almost £15m (10%) to £160m, due to significant investment in the squad, despite number of players and management falling from 172 to 151, with wages to turnover ratio worsening from 77% to 85%. Wages are up by incredible £76m (90%) from £84m in last three years. [WG: Do Everton fans think value for money has been achieved?]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/