Skip to main content

Will bond launch save Wimbledon?

I am rather more sceptical about fan owned clubs than many analysts. Of course, I do understand the motivations behind them and I am a shareholder in my local phoenix non-league club. However, I do think they face a lot of financial challenges, even if they have a relatively prosperous fan base.

Last December AFC Wimbledon faced a £11m shortfall on the completion of the construction of their 9,000-seater stadium at their spiritual home of Plough Lane. At a special general meeting of the Dons Trust, it was explained that outside investors had offered £7.5m in return for a 30 per cent stake. That would have seen the Trust in effect surrender control of the club.

A small group of three fans devised the Plough Lane Bond and yesterday it was launched to a wider public at an event in London. It is attempting to raise £5m towards the shortfall on the stadium by offering bond holders annual returns of up to four per cent on five, ten or 20 year investment terms. That is a decent coupon at today's rates, although one has to factor in an element of risk. As of last night it had raised £2m.

They need to raise another £3m by February 14th so that the club can raise the rest of the money from a commercial lender by the end of the month. I wish them well.

AFC Wimbledon are currently 20th in League One, although six points ahead of Tranmere Rovers in the first relegation place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/