Skip to main content

Fall in profit on player sales hits Saints

The authoritative Swiss Ramble analyses the 2018/19 accounts from Southampton. The Saints went a from £35m pre-tax profit to £41m loss, a swing of £76m, mainly due to profit on player sales decreasing by £48m from £69m to £21m (Virgil van Dijk sale prior year). Revenue also down £3m (2%) to £150m, while expenses grew £25m.

The Swiss Ramble comments, 'The £41m loss before tax is actually the third highest to date in the 2018/19 Premier League, only surpassed by Everton and Chelsea, but their numbers were significantly worse (over £100m). It is true that half the clubs in the top flight lose money, but this is not great.'

The loss in 2019 came after five consecutive profitable years, worth £126m in total, including £42m in 2017 and £35m in 2018. Between 2006 and 2013 they reported (smallish) losses in League One, the Championship and the first season back in the Premier League.

Player trading has been a key part of the Saints business model. In the last five years, they made a hefty £205m profit from this activity with only Chelsea £332m and Liverpool £306m ahead of them.

A £3m revenue fall was driven by broadcasting’s £4m (4%) decrease from £117m to £113m, mainly due to fewer Premier League shown live. Match day was also down £2.2m (11%) from £19.2m to £17.0m, but commercial rose £3.4m (21%) from £16.4m to £19.8m.

Revenue has now fallen two years in a row from the £182m peak in 2017 to £150m in 2019, mainly due to less TV money (absence of Europa League £13m and lower finishing position in Premier League), though match day has also dropped £5m (24%).

Saints revenue of £150m is 13th highest in the Premier League, just behind Crystal Palace £154m, though the gap to the Big Six is enormous - almost a quarter of a billion to 6th placed Arsenal.

Although a substantial 75% of club revenue came from TV (£113m out of £150m), this is far from unusual in the top flight and is only the 10th highest reliance in the Premier League. Furthermore, it should be noted that no fewer than 13 of the 20 clubs are above 70%.

Saints have signed a club record shirt sponsorship deal (reportedly £7.5m a year) with Chinese company LD Sports in 2019/20, replacing Virgin Media, who remain sleeve sponsor. They also have a 7-year kit supplier partnership with Under Armour, which started in 2016.

The wage bill slightly increased by £2m (2%) to £115m, though this disguised a reduction in underlying wages, as bonuses based on final league position rose. Wages have grown by less than £3m in last two years, but wages to turnover up from 62% to 77%, due to revenue fall. The increase in the wages to turnover ratio to 77% means that this is the fifth highest (worst) in the Premier League of clubs that have reported to date, though a fair way below Bournemouth 85%. However, it is above UEFA’s recommended 70% maximum limit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...