Skip to main content

Covid-19 hits Spurs finances

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest financial results for 2019/20 for Tottenham Hotspur.

Tottenham Hotspur’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season that was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but they still benefited from the new stadium.

The club swung from £87m profit before tax to £68m loss, a deterioration of £155m. Revenue dropped £69m (15%) from club record £461m to £392m (including exceptional £11m TV rebate), while profit on player sales rose £4m to £15m and expenses increased £85m. After tax loss was £64m.

This is the first year that Spurs have reported a loss since way back in 2012 – and that was only £7m. In the intervening 7 seasons, they have generated an impressive £412m of profits, averaging £59m a year. In 2018 and 2019 alone they delivered a hefty £226m.

Main driver of revenue fall is broadcasting, down £108m (44%) to £136m, due to Premier League deferral/rebate and reaching Champions League final prior season. However, new stadium led to growth in match day, up £13m (16%) to £95m, and commercial, up £26m (19%) to £162m.

The £68m loss is largest of the three Premier League clubs that have published 2019/20 accounts, much higher than Manchester United £21m, and is actually 14th worst ever in the Premier League.. However, all clubs likely to report worse numbers last season, e.g. Spurs had highest £87m profit in 2018/19.

COVID has significantly impacted revenue with some deferred into the 2020/21 accounts, while 5 matches were played behind closed doors, retail stores were closed, stadium tours and conferences were halted for 3 months, and none of the contracted summer events could take place.

The pandemic has significantly impacted finances in 2019/20 with many leading clubs posting horrific losses, e.g. Roma £184m, Milan £176m, Inter £90m, Barcelona £87m and Juventus £81m. From that perspective, the club's £64m (after tax) does not seem too bad.

The bottom line only benefited from £15m profit on player sales, albeit up from prior year’s £11m, mainly Christian Eriksen to Inter and Kieran Trippier to Atletico Madrid. This was much lower than some other clubs, e.g. Chelsea £60m.

Player sales have had a big impact on club figures with £166m coming from this activity in last 5 years, though worth noting they have been profitable even without this in 4 of those years. To reinforce the point that player sales have been a major part of the club's financial success, in the 5 years up to 2019 they made a sizeable £172m from this activity, only surpassed by Chelsea and Liverpool.

Despite the 2020 fall, revenue has still grown by £182m (87%) since 2016 from £210m to £392m, mainly commercial £103m and match day £54m. However, chairman Daniel Levy has estimated revenue loss for current year as an “irrecoverable” £150m if stadium remains closed. In fact, Spurs have enjoyed the highest percentage revenue growth of the Big Six since 2016.

The £392m revenue is now around the same level as Arsenal £395m, though the Gunners’ figure is likely to be lower when they publish COVID-impacted 2019/20 accounts. That said, Spurs are still a fair way behind the other leading clubs, e.g. Manchester United were nearly £120m ahead.

TV money has driven the club's revenue growth in recent years, but plunged £108m (44%) from £244m to £136m (domestic £85m, Europe £51m), due to revenue from 7 Premier League games slipping to 2020/21 accounts (plus £11m rebate to broadcasters) and lower Champions League money.

The club earned (estimated) £61m (€69m) after being eliminated in Champions League last 16, much less than prior season’s £90m for reaching the final, comprising €15m participation fee, €19m prize money, €23m UEFA coefficient and €12m TV pool This is before a 16% COVID rebate.

It is worth noting the big financial differences in Europe, e.g. Manchester United reached Europa League semi-final, but only got £25m, while Spurs received £61m in the Champions League, despite only reaching last 16. Therefore, Spurs will see revenue drop this season in the Europa League.

The importance of the Champions League to club revenue growth is clearly evident, as they have received €278m from this competition in the last 4 years, only surpassed by Manchester City €307m. Most tellingly, this is €117m more than Arsenal €161m in the same period.

The £95m match day revenue has overtaken Manchester United's £90m and is only behind Arsenal £96m, which will fall in 2019/20. In fact, based on incredible £5.9m per match for games played with fans, Spurs’ revenue would have been as high as £124m in a normal season.

The splendid new stadium has a 62,000 capacity, though there were lengthy delays and the total cost was £1.2 bln. Nevertheless, it will drive significant revenue growth, while the club is pushing for a £25m naming rights deal (more challenging, due to COVID).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/