Skip to main content

Covid-19 hits Spurs finances

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest financial results for 2019/20 for Tottenham Hotspur.

Tottenham Hotspur’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season that was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but they still benefited from the new stadium.

The club swung from £87m profit before tax to £68m loss, a deterioration of £155m. Revenue dropped £69m (15%) from club record £461m to £392m (including exceptional £11m TV rebate), while profit on player sales rose £4m to £15m and expenses increased £85m. After tax loss was £64m.

This is the first year that Spurs have reported a loss since way back in 2012 – and that was only £7m. In the intervening 7 seasons, they have generated an impressive £412m of profits, averaging £59m a year. In 2018 and 2019 alone they delivered a hefty £226m.

Main driver of revenue fall is broadcasting, down £108m (44%) to £136m, due to Premier League deferral/rebate and reaching Champions League final prior season. However, new stadium led to growth in match day, up £13m (16%) to £95m, and commercial, up £26m (19%) to £162m.

The £68m loss is largest of the three Premier League clubs that have published 2019/20 accounts, much higher than Manchester United £21m, and is actually 14th worst ever in the Premier League.. However, all clubs likely to report worse numbers last season, e.g. Spurs had highest £87m profit in 2018/19.

COVID has significantly impacted revenue with some deferred into the 2020/21 accounts, while 5 matches were played behind closed doors, retail stores were closed, stadium tours and conferences were halted for 3 months, and none of the contracted summer events could take place.

The pandemic has significantly impacted finances in 2019/20 with many leading clubs posting horrific losses, e.g. Roma £184m, Milan £176m, Inter £90m, Barcelona £87m and Juventus £81m. From that perspective, the club's £64m (after tax) does not seem too bad.

The bottom line only benefited from £15m profit on player sales, albeit up from prior year’s £11m, mainly Christian Eriksen to Inter and Kieran Trippier to Atletico Madrid. This was much lower than some other clubs, e.g. Chelsea £60m.

Player sales have had a big impact on club figures with £166m coming from this activity in last 5 years, though worth noting they have been profitable even without this in 4 of those years. To reinforce the point that player sales have been a major part of the club's financial success, in the 5 years up to 2019 they made a sizeable £172m from this activity, only surpassed by Chelsea and Liverpool.

Despite the 2020 fall, revenue has still grown by £182m (87%) since 2016 from £210m to £392m, mainly commercial £103m and match day £54m. However, chairman Daniel Levy has estimated revenue loss for current year as an “irrecoverable” £150m if stadium remains closed. In fact, Spurs have enjoyed the highest percentage revenue growth of the Big Six since 2016.

The £392m revenue is now around the same level as Arsenal £395m, though the Gunners’ figure is likely to be lower when they publish COVID-impacted 2019/20 accounts. That said, Spurs are still a fair way behind the other leading clubs, e.g. Manchester United were nearly £120m ahead.

TV money has driven the club's revenue growth in recent years, but plunged £108m (44%) from £244m to £136m (domestic £85m, Europe £51m), due to revenue from 7 Premier League games slipping to 2020/21 accounts (plus £11m rebate to broadcasters) and lower Champions League money.

The club earned (estimated) £61m (€69m) after being eliminated in Champions League last 16, much less than prior season’s £90m for reaching the final, comprising €15m participation fee, €19m prize money, €23m UEFA coefficient and €12m TV pool This is before a 16% COVID rebate.

It is worth noting the big financial differences in Europe, e.g. Manchester United reached Europa League semi-final, but only got £25m, while Spurs received £61m in the Champions League, despite only reaching last 16. Therefore, Spurs will see revenue drop this season in the Europa League.

The importance of the Champions League to club revenue growth is clearly evident, as they have received €278m from this competition in the last 4 years, only surpassed by Manchester City €307m. Most tellingly, this is €117m more than Arsenal €161m in the same period.

The £95m match day revenue has overtaken Manchester United's £90m and is only behind Arsenal £96m, which will fall in 2019/20. In fact, based on incredible £5.9m per match for games played with fans, Spurs’ revenue would have been as high as £124m in a normal season.

The splendid new stadium has a 62,000 capacity, though there were lengthy delays and the total cost was £1.2 bln. Nevertheless, it will drive significant revenue growth, while the club is pushing for a £25m naming rights deal (more challenging, due to COVID).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do