Skip to main content

Covid-19 and football finances

Assessing the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic for football finances is far from easy.   Apart from anything else, we don't know what the future course of the pandemic will be, e.g., whether mutations will significantly reduce the efficacy of the available vaccines.

In any case there has already been pressure on broadcasting contracts which have been coming in around 10 per cent below previous values which would mean a £450m fall in revenues for the Premier League.  In the UK, Sky has new leadership, BT has decided that its optimal strategy is to settle for second place and Amazon is an opportunistic purchaser: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/jan/11/tension-everywhere-premier-league-back-foot-uk-tv-rights-auction-nears

There is a temptation in this situation which some analysts have fallen to resort to hyperbole and overly pessimistic accounts of the end of football finance as we know it (this does not apply to the cited article which is a very balanced and careful assessment).

One issue that has arisen is the £300m of loans made by the Bank of England to Arsenal and Tottenham Hotspur.   There have been complaints that this could have a distorting effect on the Premier League.

The clubs used the Bank's Covid corporate financing facility, a form of low-cost borrowing open only to companies with an investment grade credit rating.   Smaller rivals are ineligible under the terms of the scheme.  It has been claimed that interest rates on the Bank scheme are lower than those on other Government-backed Covid loan schemes.

A backlash against some clubs including Liverpool and Spurs using the furlough scheme for non-playing staff has made other clubs reluctant to use that option.

One club told the Financial Times off the record, 'It feels strange that state aid is being refused to most clubs because it's not palatable from a PR perspective, but Arsenal and Spurs have borrowed quarter of a billion pounds between them.'

Another chief executive told the Pink 'Un: 'It's slightly galling some clubs are hugely criticised for using the furlough scheme [while] we don't get access to the Bank of England scheme.'

The Bank of England is, of course, not part of the government as such, but is part of the state.   There is a complex and sometimes tense relationship between the Bank and the Treasury, but the Bank has enough independence to do things that the Government could not do,  Its democratic accountability is indirect, to say the least.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl