Skip to main content

Ligue 1 ends up as a price taker

France' Ligue 1 is the least attractive and successful of the top five league competitions in Europe.   Apart from anything else, its domination by Paris Saint-Germain does not make it a very interesting competition. 

Now Ligue 1 has made a mess of its television deal.  Its ambition was to be a price maker and it has ended up a price taker.

Mediapro simply stopped paying instalments on its €780m annual television rights deal.  Not enough people want to sign up to its new Téléfoot channel.   It was able to return the rights in return for paying what is reported to be just €100m.

Canal Plus is most likely to take the rights over, but can name its price.   It will not meet Ligue 1's ambition of getting a deal closer to the more lucrative ones in England and Spain.

This will leave a huge hole in the finances of some French clubs with those with high debts such as Lille in a vulnerable position.  Rennes expects to post a €40m loss in 2020.

Bordeaux has reported big losses of €67m: https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2021/bordeaux-make-e67m-in-losses/.  Its owner, US investment company King Street Capital, reportedly wants to sell the club.

The French league could try to commercialise its television rights and sell them off through a separate company as Serie A has done.   That deal attracted plenty of interest, but would the same apply in the case of France?

Writing in the Financial Times, Leila Abboud argues that 'greed' led Ligue 1 to choose the unproven Mediapro.

This is a word we hear a lot of in relation to football, but isn't any business allowed to try and improve its returns, particularly one made up of member businesses?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/