Skip to main content

Seifert gives it large

There's been some interesting interviews at the Financial Times Football Business summit today, not least an interview with the chief executive of the Bundesliga, Christian Seifert.

Much of the talk today has been about a European Super League and Seifert made it clear that he had no time for some of the so-called super clubs, no names, no pack drill, but it was evident that Barcelona and Real Madrid were not too far from his mind.   Some of these clubs, he argued, were poorly managed cash burning machines and were not even close to a sustainable business model.

Just like Serie A, the Bundesliga is going to start talking to private equity companies (apparently as many as 40 have expressed an interest).  The test will be whether they can help the Bundesliga to grow in the long term on a global scale.   It is likely that what would be on offer would be a minority stake in a company dealing with international rights.

Asked if the league would be more competitive without the 50+1 rule he said that it was currently being reviewed by the Bundeskartellamt and they were expecting an outcome within four months.   Some clubs would welcome investors and it would be possible to have a 80+1 rule with a 90 per cent decision point which would still give fans a stake.

Asked about a salary cap, he said that would have to be discussed with the European Commission as there are clearly potentially anti-trust issues.   He was in favour.  It would still be possible to have very well paid players, but he wouldn't be drawn on what the cap should be.  At the moment all the risk was with the clubs rather than the players and without a cap one couldn't get a sustainable business model.

Later an American participant said that the top 50 European sports franchises were of interest.  They were an appreciating asset class with unique characteristics.  Materially they had out performed other asset classes such as equities.  60 to 70 per cent of annual revenues were guaranteed.  Sports was crucial content for the media.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/