Skip to main content

European qualification could boost West Ham

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has been commenting on the recently reported accounts of West Ham United from his fastness in Zurich.  Data; analysis; insight - he has it all.

West Ham’s operating loss (excluding player sales and interest) more than doubled from £37m to £85m, though other clubs had even higher losses: Everton £175m, Chelsea  £112m, Arsenal £99m and Southampton £87m

All Premier League clubs’ revenue is down in 2019/20, due to the impact of the pandemic, though West Ham’s 27% reduction is the highest in the Premier League (larger clubs are more in absolute terms)

The club have posted losses two years in a row, amounting to a combined £94m deficit, though they made profits in 4 of the previous 5 years. 2019/20 is the highest loss since £37m in 2008 (including £26m fine for rules breach for the transfers of Tevez and Mascherano).

Like many clubs, West Ham have become increasingly reliant on player sales, averaging £24m a season over the last four years. This season will benefit from the sale of Grady Diangana to WBA, though the transfer of Sebastian Haller to Ajax was at a loss.

The £140m revenue is down to 12th highest in the Premier League, though this is partly because their accounts close relatively early on 31st May, so more revenue has been deferred to the 2020/21 accounts than others whose accounts close on 30th June or 31st July

The club could benefit if they managed to qualify for Europe this season. As an example of what they could earn, English Champions League representatives received an average of £72m in 2019/20. It’s far less lucrative in the Europa League, but clubs still averaged £20m

Average attendance rose from 58,325 to 59,925 (for those games played with fans), which is second highest in the Premier League, only beaten by Manchester United 72,726

However, the move to London Stadium has not exactly been a money-spinner, partly due to competitive pricing, which has restricted revenue growth: £27m in 2018/19 (pre-COVID) was the same as last season at Boleyn, though a better comparative might be £20m in a “normal” season

Commercial revenue fell £2m (5%) from £36m to £34m, comprising £26m commercial activities and £9m retail and merchandising, due to closure of outlets. In last 5 years, growth of £13m (58%), but significantly outpaced in absolute terms by Big Six, e.g. Spurs £102m.   Commercial income of £34m is the  8th highest in England, but still a long way behind the Big Six (the lowest of which is Arsenal £142m, i.e. four times as much).

The wage bill is around mid-table in the Premier League, though £38m below 7th placed Everton £165m. This is less than half of the highest wages reported in the Premier League to date for 2019/20, namely at Manchester United  £284m and Chelsea £283m.

The reported wages to turnover ratio is 94%, but falls to 91% if severance payment excluded, which is up from 52% in 2017. Either way, it is the highest in the Premier League to date in 2019/20 and the worst since QPR’s 129% in 2013. It would have been 73% without COVID revenue loss.  [This would be much nearer the Uefa recommended level of 70 per cent]

[WG: What strikes me is how big the gap is between the Big Six and the rest.  European qualification would help West Ham close the gap, but they would need to achieve it for more than one year and preferably in the Champions League].


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/