Skip to main content

Resilient United divi up for Glazers

The authoritative Swiss Ramble turns his forensic gaze to the latest accounts of Manchester United.  Some highlights from his analysis follow.

Despite the reduction, a £41m profit during the pandemic times represents an impressive achievement for Manchester United. As Ed Woodward said, “While the disruption to our operations remains significant, we are pleased by the tremendous resilience the club has demonstrated.”

These results might look better than many feared, but it is worth remembering that figures are usually worse in the second half of the year, emphasises the Zurich-based analyst.    They are in better shape than most with their many commercial partners. While they will struggle with the financial challenges of COVID-19, Finance Director Cliff Baty said, “We are well positioned to weather the current uncertainty and optimistic for the future.”

The main reason for lower revenue was match day, which fell £52m (94%) from £55m to just £3m, while commercial dropped £29m (19%) from £151m to £122m. This was partly offset by broadcasting rising £59m (60%) from £98m to £156m, mainly due to return to Champions League.

The club reported an operating loss of £13m (excluding player sales and interest) for the first time in ages. This is likely to be repeated this season, as operating profit fell from £36m to £20m in the first six months and there will probably be a large loss second half.

Commercial revenue fell £29m (19%) from £151m to £122m, as sponsorship dropped £25m (25%) from £99m to £74m, including no pre-season tour and prior year once-off credit, and retail was down £4m (8%) from £52m to £48m, due to Megastore closure for a month and lower footfall.

The £536m gross debt is £44m more than £492m prior year comparative, though only £10m higher than June 2020, as the club drew down £60m of Bank of America £200m credit facility. This is the highest debt since 2010, i.e. before the Payment in Kind loans were paid off.

Higher gross debt and lower cash means that the club’s net debt rose £64m (16%) from £391m to £456m. This means that net debt has increased by £138m (43%) in just 2 years since 2019 (£318m).

Although it has fallen from its peak, the club still made a £10m interest payment in the first half. This will amount to £20m for the full-year, which is the highest in the Premier League, ahead of Spurs £14m and Arsenal £11m. This is the cost of carrying so much external debt.

Despite the financial challenges, Manchester United have still found enough cash to pay their shareholders (mainly the Glazers) a full dividend. Nothing was paid in the first six months, but a £10.7m payment was made seven days after these accounts. This works out to £23m annually (£112m in last five years)

WG adds: I have always been an admirer of Manchester United's commercial operation which is one of the most sophisticated anywhere and manages to get obscure sponsorships from the least likely global locations.    Meanwhile, the Glazers, who are smart operators, have done well from their Manchester franchise in terms of both capital appreciation and income.  You can make money out of football, but someone has to pay the price.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/