Skip to main content

Fans look for a greater say in clubs

Singaporean billionaire Peter Lim owns Valencia CF, one of Spain’s biggest football clubs. Fans complain he uses their team for personal enrichment, such as speculating on players by trading in Europe’s multibillion-euro transfer market. 

“I can do 101 things to make money, and money that I believe I can better control,” said Lim, in an interview with the Financial Times this week. “This is something quite nice. I wake up, I own a football club and I see what happens next. It’s nothing more.”

For Lim, Valencia is a “trophy asset”, one that allows him to socialise with the sport’s rich and famous. He has no desire to sell, but believes the club is worth substantially more than the €100m he spent to acquire a majority stake in 2014. Instead, Lim has engaged in a fire sale of players, arguing runaway spending on footballers is no longer sustainable. 

This approach to club ownership reveals a growing disconnect between some wealthy overseas investors drawn to the sport’s huge global audiences, and local fan bases who still view football clubs as primarily a source of community pride.

In Valencia’s case, Libertad VCF, a supporter’s group, is attempting to persuade thousands of individual Valencia shareholders to join forces with a combined five per cent stake. At that threshold, under Spanish law, the group can better scrutinise club operations, such as gaining access to contracts or appointing a board member. 

Changes are afoot elsewhere. Chelsea said this week that three supporters will be invited to attend board meetings and participate in the club’s decision making process.   They will not, however, be able to vote or discuss matters relating to players or managers which leaves them with topics such as ticket prices and catering.

Some English fans would love to adopt German football’s 50+1 system, where in most cases, clubs must be majority-owned by their members.  That model has its drawbacks, such as making clubs unattractive to foreign investors. That helps to partly explain why Bundesliga, Germany’s top tier, is dominated by Bayern Munich, the nation’s wealthiest club and a darling of German corporate sponsors. Still, attempts to tweak the 50+1 system have failed thanks to resistance from fan groups.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/