Skip to main content

Newcastle's focus is on the bottom line not the pitch

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest accounts of Newcastle United.  Although the financial picture is relatively healthy, essentially the club is stagnating.

The club swung from £41m pre-tax profit to £26m loss, as revenue fell £23.8m (14%) from £176.4m to £152.6m, partly due to COVID, while expenses increased £45m (28%), including an additional month of accounts. Profit on player sales was up £2m to £26m. Loss after tax was £23m.

At an operating level (i.e. excluding player sales and interest), Newcastle deteriorated from £15m profit to £54m loss. This is the club’s worst ever performance, but is still in the top half of the Premier League with no fewer than 5 clubs having operating losses above £100m.

Main driver of revenue reduction was broadcasting, which fell £18m (14%) from £124m to £106m, while match day dropped £7.4m (30%) from £24.8m to £17.4m. However, commercial rose £1.4m (5%) from £27.7m to £29.1m, including £1.2m from government job retention scheme.

Even after the steep decrease in broadcasting income in 2020, this was still by far the most important revenue stream for the club, accounting for 70% of total revenue, followed by commercial 19% and match day 11%.

Although the £26m loss is obviously not great, it is actually one of the better financial results in the Premier League, as all clubs have been adversely impacted by COVID with many posting much higher losses, especially Everton £140m, Manchester City £125m and Aston Villa £99m.

Without COVID, revenue would have been £14.4m higher at £167m, due to broadcasting rebate and lost match day income. Along with £12.7m additional costs incurred for 13th month in accounts, the net impact was £27.1m, so club’s underlying profit was a healthy £1m.

The bottom line was boosted by £26.3m profit on player sales, up from £24.6m prior year, mainly due to Ayoze Perez’s move to Leicester City. This was the 7th highest profit in the Premier League from this activity, though far below Chelsea £143m.

Newcastle have made money in eight of the last 10 years, the only exceptions being 2017 (Championship) and 2020 (COVID). They posted £94m profits in this period, which is impressive from a financial perspective, though the Toon Army would have liked to see more of that money on the pitch.  The focus on the bottom line is very well illustrated by them reporting the 4th highest aggregate profit in England in the last decade of £94m.

Despite the fall in 2020, the £153m revenue has grown £27m (21%) in last four years, entirely due to the new TV deal that started in 2017/18. It’s a similar story since Ashley’s arrival in 2007, as revenue has grown £66m, but £80m is from centrally negotiated TV contracts.

The £153m revenue was 8th highest in the Premier League, only behind the Big Six and  West Ham. However, there is a substantial gap to sixth place with Newcastle being less than half of Arsenal £343m and less than a third of top of the (financial) table Manchester United £509m.

Newcastle have only qualified for Europe once under Ashley, earning just €5m in 13 years. In contrast, they qualified in 10 of the 13 years before he became owner, including three times for the Champions League. As an example of what they could have won, Spurs got €272m in last four years.

Ashley has barely managed to grow commercial income at all in 13 years, so the club has fallen way behind rivals in this important revenue stream, e.g. the Big Six have grown by £100-230m in this period. Newcastle outsourced catering in 2009, but that was only worth £6m.

Ashley did pay the club £141k, though this was down from prior season’s £1.1m and less than the £594k the club spent on purchasing goods from the owner’s companies. Previous accounts said the club would receive payment from Sports Direct for stadium advertising, but not quantified.

Player sales have had a decent impact on profits, contributing £185m in the last decade. The five years £85m. There was very little money in the 2020/21 season, as largely free transfers.

The reported wage bill rose £24m (25%) from £97m to £121m, mainly because accounting period was extended to 31st July, thus covering 13 months. Increase would have only been £15m to £112m if adjusted for 12 months. Increase also driven by 14 growth in headcount.

As testament to fans’ loyalty, average attendance has been around 50,000 for last 10 years, including a very impressive 51,108 in the Championship.  Despite the decrease in 2019/20, the attendance of 48,248 remained the 7th highest in the Premier League, but it is worth noting that the club reportedly had to give away around 10,000 half season tickets to present a full stadium to broadcasters (and potential purchasers).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/