Skip to main content

Premier League Covid losses should give pause for thought

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the impact of Covid-19 on Premier League and sounds a warning from his Zurich fastness.   He states: ‘The size of the Premier League losses really should give pause for thought, so I’ll say it again: £1.4 bn over the past two seasons. In that period, six clubs have lost more than £120m. Although losses are smaller outside the Big Six, they are still significant in percentage terms.’

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant adverse impact on football clubs, though it is important to distinguish between money that has been completely lost to the game and income that has simply been deferred.

All Premier League clubs experienced a decrease in their revenue in 2019/20 – except the three clubs that were promoted from the Championship, who were boosted by the lucrative TV deal in the top flight.   In total, I estimate that Premier League clubs lost £326m revenue due to COVID in 2019/20, split broadcasting PL £160m, match day £146m, TV Europe £13m and commercial £6m.

Of course, the COVID impact will have been much larger in 2020/21, as almost all games were played without fans. I have estimated £1,049m: (a) match day £698m (95% loss); (b) Premier League rebate £97m (media reports); (c) Europe TV £14m (rebate); commercial £240m (15% decrease).

Excluding those three promoted clubs, revenue for the other 17 clubs dropped £641m (13%) from £4,773m to £4,132m, mainly due to broadcasting, down £683m (25%) to £2,045m, though match day also fell £95m (14%) to £563m. Partly offset by commercial growing £138m (10%) to £1,520m.

There was little COVID impact on commercial income in 2019/20, thanks to existing contractual arrangements, only amounting to £6m lost and £13m deferred. The effect is likely to have been much higher in the 2020/21 season, as sponsors also struggled in the pandemic.

The largest revenue decreases in 2019/20 came at Manchester United £118m and Tottenham Hotspur £69m, both of whom were impacted by worse performance in European competitions, followed by Manchester City £57m, Arsenal £51m and West Ham £51m. In contrast, there were very small falls at Everton £2m and Burnley £4m.

Clearly, it is likely that the biggest revenue impact in absolute terms would be at the bigger clubs, on account of their higher revenue base.   However, in percentage terms others suffered more: Bournemouth 27 per cent, West Ham 27 per cent and Wolves 13 per cent.  Average decline was 13 per cent.

Five Premier League clubs will have lost more than £100m revenue due to COVID in 2020/21: Manchester United £155m, Tottenham Hotspur £142m, Liverpool £123m, Arsenal £116m and Manchester City £104m, with Chelsea not far behind at £97m. Then, there is a big drop to West Ham £39m.

Much of 2020/21 COVID impact is driven by match day, as virtually the whole season was played behind closed doors, so clubs earning a lot from this revenue stream miss out the most, e.g. Spurs £111m (following move to new stadium), Manchester United £104m, Arsenal £88m and Liverpool £80m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/