Skip to main content

Premier League Covid losses should give pause for thought

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the impact of Covid-19 on Premier League and sounds a warning from his Zurich fastness.   He states: ‘The size of the Premier League losses really should give pause for thought, so I’ll say it again: £1.4 bn over the past two seasons. In that period, six clubs have lost more than £120m. Although losses are smaller outside the Big Six, they are still significant in percentage terms.’

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant adverse impact on football clubs, though it is important to distinguish between money that has been completely lost to the game and income that has simply been deferred.

All Premier League clubs experienced a decrease in their revenue in 2019/20 – except the three clubs that were promoted from the Championship, who were boosted by the lucrative TV deal in the top flight.   In total, I estimate that Premier League clubs lost £326m revenue due to COVID in 2019/20, split broadcasting PL £160m, match day £146m, TV Europe £13m and commercial £6m.

Of course, the COVID impact will have been much larger in 2020/21, as almost all games were played without fans. I have estimated £1,049m: (a) match day £698m (95% loss); (b) Premier League rebate £97m (media reports); (c) Europe TV £14m (rebate); commercial £240m (15% decrease).

Excluding those three promoted clubs, revenue for the other 17 clubs dropped £641m (13%) from £4,773m to £4,132m, mainly due to broadcasting, down £683m (25%) to £2,045m, though match day also fell £95m (14%) to £563m. Partly offset by commercial growing £138m (10%) to £1,520m.

There was little COVID impact on commercial income in 2019/20, thanks to existing contractual arrangements, only amounting to £6m lost and £13m deferred. The effect is likely to have been much higher in the 2020/21 season, as sponsors also struggled in the pandemic.

The largest revenue decreases in 2019/20 came at Manchester United £118m and Tottenham Hotspur £69m, both of whom were impacted by worse performance in European competitions, followed by Manchester City £57m, Arsenal £51m and West Ham £51m. In contrast, there were very small falls at Everton £2m and Burnley £4m.

Clearly, it is likely that the biggest revenue impact in absolute terms would be at the bigger clubs, on account of their higher revenue base.   However, in percentage terms others suffered more: Bournemouth 27 per cent, West Ham 27 per cent and Wolves 13 per cent.  Average decline was 13 per cent.

Five Premier League clubs will have lost more than £100m revenue due to COVID in 2020/21: Manchester United £155m, Tottenham Hotspur £142m, Liverpool £123m, Arsenal £116m and Manchester City £104m, with Chelsea not far behind at £97m. Then, there is a big drop to West Ham £39m.

Much of 2020/21 COVID impact is driven by match day, as virtually the whole season was played behind closed doors, so clubs earning a lot from this revenue stream miss out the most, e.g. Spurs £111m (following move to new stadium), Manchester United £104m, Arsenal £88m and Liverpool £80m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do