Skip to main content

Bleak prospects at Derby

No football fan can be happy with what has happened at Derby County, but it is a blatant case of financial mismanagement.   Championship clubs too often overspend in the hope of trying to reach the Premier League, but Derby have also tried to bend the rules.

The Athletic has been speaking to people with knowledge of the club’s financial position and they have not been very upbeat.

“It’s 50/50 they get liquidated,” said one source, while another said: “I can’t see how they get out of this — they’re ****ed.”  The picture they painted in such depressing tones was one of a club that is worth less than nothing. Much less. 

They said any prospective buyer would need to shell out more than £50 million simply clearing Derby’s debts before spending a penny on rebuilding the club and putting a competitive team on the park.

This is because the club has football creditors, who must be paid up to £10 million in full, as well as secured debt of £20 million owed to an American private equity firm and a tax bill of almost £30 million.

Until late last year, that last bill would have not have been such a cause for alarm to a bidder as it would have been added to the pile of unsecured debt and paid off with pennies in the pound. 

HM Revenue and Customs has been complaining about that for years and the government’s post-pandemic need for rebalancing its books meant somebody in power finally heard the taxman’s pleas. The Finance Act 2020 gave tax debt preferential status in insolvency cases. At least two-thirds of Derby’s tax arrears must now be settled in full, just like the money they still owe to other football clubs.

Under Mel Morris, Derby aimed for the stars but wound up in the gutter. Play-off defeats at the semi-final stage came in 2016 and 2018 before coming closer still in 2019, beaten by Aston Villa in a Wembley final it transpires they could not afford to lose.

That was the year Morris began to look for a way out but the damage was already done. The club’s annual wage bill had been allowed to climb to £47.8 million for 2017-18, according to the last set of accounts filed at Companies House. That equated to 161 per cent of the club’s turnover. 

Morris looked for ways to stay on the right side of the EFL’s ceiling for permitted losses, £39 million over three years. Costs were hived off into new subsidiaries, giving Derby a tangled corporate structure, and then, two days before the end of the accounting period for the 2017-18 season, he sold Pride Park to another new company he controlled for £81 million. 

It was a lever other Championship spendthrifts would pull — Aston Villa, Birmingham City, Reading and Sheffield Wednesday — but nobody paid nearly as much for their own home as Morris. 

Staggered by Derby’s valuation of the stadium, the EFL charged Derby for breaching their rules in January 2020 but the club was cleared of wrongdoing by an independent panel six months later. That was only half the story, though, as Derby also faced a second charge for their novel approach to accounting for transfers. The argument over that one went into injury time of extra time, with an appeal panel eventually ruling in the EFL’s favour four months ago. Derby were fined £100,000 and forced to submit restated accounts for the three seasons between 2015 and 2018.

It is worth noting that without the stadium-sale windfall, which gave Derby their first pre-tax profit for a decade, they would have lost £26 million in 2017-18, following losses of £8 million and £15 million in the two previous seasons. Clearly, that adds up to more than the £39 million losses allowed over three years under EFL rules. 

As well as the £120 million of loans from Morris that sit on Derby’s books, MSD Partners, an investment firm with links to American IT billionaire Michael Dell, has lent the club £20 million, with Pride Park and the training ground used as security. Morris is understood to have also provided the firm with personal guarantees for its money.

Morris has referred to “two or three” credible buyers waiting in the wings — although we have heard that before — and their ability to settle MSD’s debt will be key. 

“I still have the stadium,” said Morris. “That’s not going to be something I get recovery on because I want to make sure the club is sold to someone who can move forward on a really good basis."

As founders of the Football League, Derby have a great history and I hope a solution is found, but the more general issues raised need to be tackled.

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...