Skip to main content

Juventus make losses for four years in a row

The Swiss Ramble reports from Zurich on the latest financial results of Juventus.   One interesting general point to emerge is that Juventus are yet another club who have become increasingly reliant on player trading, but it is a volatile source of funds, especially after the pandemic.

Juventus remained in 10th place in the Deloitte Money League, based on 2019/20 revenue, having overtaken Arsenal the previous season. However, their €255m revenue growth since 2010 is the lowest in the top 10, miles below the likes of PSG, Manchester City, Barcelona, Liverpool and Spurs.

They are still very much the biggest club in Italy, certainly in financial terms. Although the 2021/22 season will deliver another large loss, the club expects the economic performance to “improve significantly starting from 2020/23 financial year.”

The pre-tax loss more than doubled from €82m to €208m (€210m after tax), despite revenue rising €43m (11%) from €407m to €450m, mainly because profit on player sales fell €136m from €167m to €31m. Operating expenses also increased by €37m (6%).   Unsurprisingly, Juventus huge €208m pre-tax loss is the worst in Italy, though their figures are the only ones to include a full year of the pandemic. In fact, it is the highest ever in Italy.

After four years of profits up to 2017, Juventus have now reported losses four years in a row, adding up to a €326m deficit in that period, including €289m in the last two years alone. COVID has exacerbated their losses. Club expects 2021/22 to also show a “significant loss”.

The club estimate the impact of COVID on 2021 revenue as €70m (match day and retail sales), while overall loss for 3-year period between 2020 & 2022, including lower player sales from less liquid transfer market, will amount to hefty €320m (assuming gradual recovery in 2022).

COVID has impacted Juventus ability to make big money from player sales. In the four years up to 2020 they averaged annual €132m profit from this activity, but only managed to realise €31m in 2021.  The importance of player trading to Juventus business model is illustrated by them making €563m profit from player sales in the 5 years up to 2020. This is nearly €200m more than the next best performer in Italy, namely Roma €372m, followed by Napoli €325m and Inter €226m.

Despite reflecting a full season of COVID, Juventus €450m revenue is still highest in Italy, well ahead of Inter €302m, Napoli €179m, Milan €172m, Roma €149m & Lazio €106m (2019/20).

Broadcasting revenue shot up €69m (41%) from €166m to €235m, a club record for this revenue stream, benefiting from income deferred from 2019/20 for games played after end-June accounting close.    It is the highest in Italy by far, but below average in Europe (in a normal year).

It is imperative that Juventus do well in the Champions League to boost their broadcasting income, as the TV rights in Serie A are relatively low.  The Champions League is extremely important for Juventus, who have earned an impressive €454m from Europe in last five seasons, which is significantly higher than other Italian clubs.

Commercial income rose €9m (5%) to €194m, as new sponsorship deals, up €16m (13%) to €146m, offset €6m reductions in sale of products. This resilience holds Juve in good stead, as other Italian clubs have suffered, e.g. Inter’s Chinese sponsors have reduced.

The wage bill rose €39m (14%) from €284m to €323m, partly due to players giving up some salary in 2020 because of COVID.   It is almost back to €328m club high in 2019. Wages have grown more than any other Italian club (€124m since 2015), but will fall after CR7’s departure.   

The wage bill of €323m is significantly higher than the rest of Serie A with closest clubs being over €100m lower: Inter €198m, Milan €161m, Roma €155m and Napoli €141m. However, a fair bit less than European peers, e.g. Barcelona €443m, PSG €414m.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do