Skip to main content

United lose over £200m from Covid

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest annual accounts of Manchester United, once again deploying his in depth knowledge and forensic analytical skills.

The pre-tax loss was up from £21m to £24m, as revenue dropped £15m (3%) from £509m to £494m and profit on player sales fell £11m to £7m, while expenses rose £16m (3%). Operational decline offset by interest swinging £39m from £26m payable to £13m recoverable thanks to forex gains.

Net loss after tax rose £69m from 23m to £92m, due to April 2023 increase in corporation tax from 19% to 25%, which meant that United wrote down the value of a US deferred tax asset, as it is no longer expected to give rise to a future economic benefit. This is a non-cash impact.

The main reason that revenue only fell 3% was £115m (82%) increase in broadcasting to £255m, mainly due to return to Champions League, which compensated for COVID driven reductions in match day, down £83m (92%) to £7m, and commercial, down £47m (17%) to £232m.

As a sign of the club’s resilience, their £24m pre-tax loss is better than most Premier League clubs in 2019/20, even though their figures are the only ones to include a full year of the pandemic. For 2020/21, Barcelona and Juventus have announced massive losses of €481m and €210m.  United had by far the smallest operating loss of major European clubs in 2020.

Revenue was significantly impacted by COVID.  The Swiss Ramble estimates the revenue loss as £170m in 2020/21 (match day £113m, commercial £47m & broadcasting £10m). Added to 2019/20 £31m loss, that gives a total of £201m. Around £24m TV revenue deferred from 2020 to 2021.

Club strategy has not been overly reliant on player sales, so their £7m profit from this activity is one of the lowest in the Premier League, down £11m from previous season.  results have rarely been boosted by player sales, only averaging £12m a year over last decade. In the 5 years up to 2020, United’s £63m profit from this activity was significantly lower than rest of the Big Six.   [Player sales are a volatile source of income and some clubs have become too reliant on them in my view - WG].

This is the second year in a row that United have posted a loss (due to COVID), but they have managed to limit these to £21m in 2020 and £24m in 2020. Before then they had accumulated an impressive £159m profit in the preceding four years, averaging £40m annually in that period.

Despite reflecting a full season of COVID, the £494m revenue is still currently the highest in England, just ahead of Liverpool £490m and Manchester City £478m (2019/20 figures), though these clubs had been significantly closing the gap with United pre-COVID.

The commercial income fell £47m (17%) from £279m to £232m, mainly due to no pre-season tour, COVID sponsorship “variations” and closure of Megastore. United’s commercial engine has essentially stalled (revenue flat for 5 years before 2021 decrease), while big growth at rivals.   The lucrative commercial deals are trending down: the new £47m TeamViewer shirt sponsorship is much lower than Chevrolet £64m, while no replacement announced for Aon training ground £15m deal that ended this summer. However, the £75m Adidas kit deal runs to 2025.   [United have been praised in the past for the sophistication of their commercial operation, so it would be interesting to probe more deeply here - WG].

That said, £232m commercial income is higher than all other PL clubs except City £246m. The fact that so much of United’s revenue is from commercial (55% in 2019/20) gives them a degree of protection from the impact of the pandemic that others don’t enjoy.

The broadcasting revenue of £255m is the second highest ever reported by an English club from this revenue stream, only below Liverpool £264m in 2019, partly due to the money deferred from the 2020 accounts. In fact, it’s the third highest anywhere, as Barcelona had £263m in 2019.

Relatively poor performance in Europe, including not even qualifying in 2015, means that they have earned “only” €284m in the last 5 years. That’s not too shabby, but it is a hefty €138m less than City €422m. Also below Liverpool €361m, Chelsea €311m and Spurs €293m.

The wage bill rose £39m (14%) from £284m to £323m, mainly due to higher bonuses for playing in the Champions League, almost back to £332m club high in 2019. After many years with the highest wages, United are still only third highest in England, below City £351m and Liverpool £326m.    However, United  estimate that their wage bill will rise by “around 20%” this season, as a result of signing Cristiano Ronaldo, Raphael Varane and Jadon Sancho. That would mean £65m increase to £387m in 2022, the highest ever in England, around the same level as Barcelona in 2020.

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 56% to 65%. This is United’s highest ever (it was only 45% in 2017), but it is still one of the lowest (best) in the Premier League. Last year it was also one of the best in Europe, sandwiched between Bayern Munich & Borussia Dortmund.


Comments

  1. Yes but think of all those Mancunians who have had to go out and buy a Ronaldo shirt two sizes bigger than the ones they already own?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/