Skip to main content

Why United favoured the Super League

Why did Manchester United back the European Super League - and pull out when they saw the reputation of their brand being threatened?

United’s owners, the Glazer family, are footing a UEFA levy that will ultimately cost between €5 million and €10 million (£4.3 million-£8.6 million) as well as a one-sixth share of the £22 million fine imposed by England’s governing bodies after United joined five other Premier League clubs in signing up for the breakaway competition.

But that commitment of at least £8 million still falls short of the £10.7 million in dividends United paid to shareholders on July 30 — the second such payment of the year. United are the only Premier League club to pay semi-annual dividends.   The Glazers receive about £8m each time. Since 2006, United have spent more than £1 billion on financing the Glazers’ leveraged takeover the previous year, with dividends and interest payments on the debt costing roughly £44 million each year.

When discussing broadcasting revenue for Premier League and European matches, the latest accounts state these contracts are “negotiated collectively by the Premier League and UEFA respectively”. “We are not a party to the contracts negotiated by the Premier League and UEFA,” the document adds. “Further, we do not participate in and therefore do not have any direct influence on the outcome of contract negotiations.”

The upshot of this is the terms may not be “as favourable to us as we might otherwise be able to negotiate individually with media distributors. Furthermore, the limited number of media distributors bidding for Premier League and UEFA club competition media rights may result in reduced prices paid for those rights and, as a result, a decline in revenue received from media contracts”.

Another passage makes clear another concern — the fact that most Premier League rule changes require the support of at least 14 of its 20 clubs.

“Our interests may not always align with the majority of clubs and it may be difficult for us to effect changes that are advantageous to us,” it says. “If the Premier League clubs pass rules that limit our ability to operate our business as we have planned or otherwise affect the payments made to us, we may be unable to achieve our goals and strategies or increase our revenue.”


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow
Post a Comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is
Post a Comment
Read more

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/
Post a Comment
Read more