Skip to main content

Healthy finances at Norwich rely on player sales

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews Norwich’s financial results for 2020/21, when they increased pre-tax profit from £2.1m to £21.5m, despite the impact of relegation to the Championship and COVID reducing revenue by £62m to £57m, thanks to £60m profit from player sakes.

it was a notable achievement for to post a £21.5m pre-tax profit. In fact, this was better than any other club in the Championship in 2019/20, when just three clubs were profitable (all of which were only around £3m).   It used to be the case that they were profitable in the Premier League, but lost money following relegation, but they were also profitable twice in last 4 years they were in the Championship.

Main driver of the revenue decrease was broadcasting, down £41m (46%) from £90m to £49m, as TV deal much more lucrative in Premier League, while gate receipts dropped from £7.6m to just £0.1m as games played behind closed doors and commercial fell £13m (62%) from £21m to £8m.   Despite the significant decrease, the £57m revenue was still one of the highest in the Championship, around the same level as three other relegated clubs in 2019/20,

After surging to £21m in the Premier League, commercial revenue dropped £13m (62%) to £8m after relegation, with big falls in sponsorship and advertising from £10.3m to £2.7m and catering from £4.6m to £0.4m, as COVID took a toll.   This is still pretty good for the Championship.

The bottom line was massively boosted by £60m profit from player sales, up from only £2m prior season, including the club record sale of Emi Buendia to Aston Villa.  By far the highest in Championship in the last two years.

The business model is very dependent on player sales, where they have made an impressive £158m profit in the last 7 years, including £60m in 2021 and £48m in 2018, mainly due to the big money sales of James Maddison to Leicester City and Josh Murphy to Cardiff City.   The club have the two highest annual profits from player sales in Championship history.  [Clubs across the board are becoming more reliant on player sales to stay in the black].

Championship revenue ranking is hugely influenced by parachute payments. Details for 2020/21 have not yet been published, but relegated clubs received £42m in the first year in 2019/20. If Norwich are again immediately relegated this season, will only get two years of parachutes.

The wage bill fell £22m (25%) from £89m to £67m following relegation, though this was still the club’s third highest ever. Wages would have been much lower without a good-sized bonus payment for the Championship-winning promotion exploits.  Despite the decrease, the  £67m wage bill was still one of the highest in the Championship, though the three largest were all inflated by promotion payments.

Following the big decrease in revenue due to relegation and COVID, the wages to turnover ratio increased from 75% to 117%, though not as high as 2019 (when they had no parachute payments). The vast majority of clubs in the Championship have (unsustainable) ratios over 100%.

gross debt more than doubled from £14m to £29m, mainly £25m bank loan secured on TV money, repayable by September 2022, plus £2.3m Canary Bond and £250k from directors to help fund the new training ground. Also includes £1.4m preference shares classified as debt.   Even after the increase, the club’s £29m debt was still one of the smallest in the Championship, miles below the likes of Stoke City £187m, Blackburn Rovers £156m, Birmingham City £116m and Middlesbrough £116m.

The Canaries paid £978k interest in 2020/21, down from prior year £2.5m, though their bank loan charges a chunky 5%. Most debt in the Championship is provided interest-free by club owners, so only 5 clubs pay more than £1m annual interest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/