Skip to main content

Rochdale fans fight back against hostile takeover

Rochdale fans have fought back against the threat of a hostile takeover and safeguarded the club. Since early August, Rochdale have been embroiled in a fight for their future after several major shareholders including Andrew Kilpatrick, the son of former chairman David, and former chief executive David Bottomley sold up to new investors Andy Curran and Darrell Rose.

New investment is rarely treated with caution in football but alarm bells started ringing when Curran and Rose began paying well over the odds for shares — in some cases as much as £10 for shares only valued at £2 each — with little explanation. The pair had a limited digital footprint and no obvious connection to Rochdale — neither the town 10 miles north of Manchester or its football club — to explain their desire to invest so heavily in a team that is self-sustainable and has spent the bulk of its recent history in League Two.

They quietly amassed enough to constitute ownership of roughly 42.3 per cent of the club before even approaching the club or submitting to the EFL’s owners’ and directors’ test.

That is when Rochdale fans stepped in, and it is a testament to them and their ownership structure that has saved them from an uncertain fate. Since the hostile takeover attempt was brought to light, fan pressure was key as Curran and Rose’s firm Morton House announced it would step back and seek to divest its shares.

Although the first battle was won, Rochdale were in limbo while they waited to see who might buy up the Morton House shares. There was interest from former Charlton Athletic chairman Matt Southall, who met with the Dale Trust to discuss investing but has since moved out of the picture. Southall’s fractious tenure at and exit from Charlton was a concern for Rochdale fans.

He told the Trust that, like Morton House, he would oppose the club’s next move intended to ensure a more stable future and called an extraordinary general meeting early in October to issue nearly 400,000 new shares (adding to the existing 502,957 shares) in the football club. The motion passed with just one shareholder voting against the motion and the backing of 98.6 per cent of the membership of the Dale Trust. No representatives of Morton House showed up to the EGM.

Shares have sold well, with large quantities already purchased by local fans, the Dale Trust and the club’s Community Trust, which should dilute Morton House’s holding from around 42 per cent to below 30 per cent. The new share issue has also, vitally, put funds directly back into the club whereas those shares bought up by Curran and Rose did not.

The pair can still sell their shares but Rochdale is now protected from a further hostile takeover by “an enhanced version of the old ownership model”, according to another supporter who, like many others, bought shares in the new issue.

They are the proud owners of their club and have cheered Stockdale’s side through this most tumultuous season in the knowledge that they have done all in their power to save an asset so important to the community. Rochdale can dare to make plans again and the new board have fast won the backing of fans, who will remember those who did not help them through these past tough months as much as those who did.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/