Skip to main content

Chairman looks after Millwall

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest accounts of Millwall.

Millwall’s financial results for the 2020/21 season, when their pre-tax loss widened from £10.9m to £13.8m, as revenue fell £3.9m (24%) from £16.4m to £12.5m, due to COVID.   The loss wass covered by £8m share capital from owners and £8m EFL loan.  Profit was “significantly impacted” by COVID with total revenue loss to date estimated as £7m, including £6m in 2020/21, partly offset by iFollow streaming income and £1.4m staff furlough income

The pre-tax loss widened from £10.9m to £13.8m, largely due to revenue falling £3.9m (24%) from £16.4m to £12.5m, though operating expenses were up £0.7m (3%). actually one of the best results in the Championship, where most clubs operate at a significant loss.

 Partly offset by profit on player sales increasing £0.6m to £0.7m and other income rising £1.2m to £2.1m.   This was the lowest reported in the Championship, far below the likes of Norwich £60m, WBA £29m and Bristol City £26m.

Millwall have rarely made big money from player sales, only generating a profit above £0.5m once in the last 10 years: £5.4m in 2019, thanks to George Saville’s move to Boro.  Similar story this season with Jason McCarthy’s return to Wycombe the only noteworthy sale.

The £13.8m loss is not great, but it is still only mid-table in the Championship. As owner John Berylson said, “You have teams that are going to lose £20-30m this season – some were losing that before the pandemic.”

The Lions have not posted a profit in the last 10 years, losing £78m in this period. In fairness, their losses had been reducing (from £12m in 2015 to only £1m in 2019), but the onset of the pandemic (and a rising wage bill) has resulted in sizeable losses since then.

The £4.0m revenue decrease was largely driven by match day falling £3.0m (67%) from £4.4m to £1.4m, as COVID meant games being played behind closed doors, while broadcasting also decreased £1.0m (11%) from £9.4m to £8.4m. Broadcasting income fell by £1.0m (11%) from £9.4m to £8.4m, due to COVID impact, having peaked at £10.0m in 2018 due to FA Cup money. Most Championship clubs earn £7-9m from TV, but there is a massive gap to clubs with parachute payments.

Commercial income held steady at £2.7m.  This was a decent achievement, but this is still one of the lowest in the Championship, miles below the likes of Bristol City and Stoke City (around £14m).  £12.5m revenue is one of the smallest in the Championship, significantly below clubs in receipt of parachute payments

The impact of COVID means that the £12.5m revenue is their lowest since they were last in League One four years ago. It has dropped by a third since their pre-pandemic £18.4m peak in 2019, which was also boosted by the run to FA Cup quarter-finals.

Despite the revenue fall, the wage bill rose £1.9m (10%) from £18.9m to £20.8m, reflecting investment into the playing squad and football management team. Wages have more than doubled since promotion to the Championship from £9.4m paid in League One in 2017. Even after the growth the £21m wage bill is still very much on the low side in the Championship.

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 115% to 167%, which is not great, though is clearly impacted by COVID. Also, most clubs in the ultra-competitive Championship have ratios above 100%, i.e. much worse than UEFA’s recommended 70% upper limit.

The £1.5m expenditure on player purchases in 2020/21 was one of the lowest in the Championship, paling into insignificance compared to recruitment at clubs relegated from the top flight, e.g. Fulahm £53m and WBA £34m (both in 2019/20).  The small transfer spend is nothing new for Millwall. Even if gross spend has increased in the last five years, the annual average is still less than £2m. The objective seems to be to balance the books, leading to a low number of senior players compared to other clubs.

The club will be happy that grounds returned to full capacity at the start of 2021/22 season. Their 13,734 average attendance in 2019/20 (for games played with fans) was one of the lowest in the Championship, but was club’s highest since they were in the top flight in 1988/89. 

Gross debt increased from £10m to £18m, due to a new £8m EFL loan, repayable over next 3 seasons, which was used to repay money owed to HMRC. Loan notes from the owners remain £10m, though repayment has been extended again to July 2023.  The £18m gross debt is very small compared to many other clubs in the Championship, e.g. Stoke City £187m and Blackburn Rovers £156m, though would be much higher without the owners effectively writing-off £30m by waiving interest and converting loans into equity.

Chairman John Berylson’s company CHV charges 12% a year on the loan notes, but interest payments have been frequently suspended.  One fan commented, ‘Makes we wonder where we would be without JB.’


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/