Skip to main content

Covid and parachute payments hit Bristol City

The Swiss Ramble provides a forensic analysis of the accounts of Bristol City from Zurich.

The pre-tax loss widened from £10m to £38m, as profit from player sales dropped from £26m to £6m and revenue fell £10m (39%) from £27m to £17m, due to COVID. Wages to turnover ratio was 212%, clearly not sustainable,  gross debt £96m.   Unsurprisingly, the £38m loss is one of the worst in the Championship, though other clubs’ figures will also be bad when they publish 2020/21 accounts.

The revenue decrease was largely driven by COVID (games played behind closed doors and stadium lockdown), as commercial fell £6.1m (44%) to £7.7m and match day dropped £4.0m (85%) to £0.7m. Broadcasting was also down £0.4m (5%) to £8.2m. Government grants up £1.0m to £1.6m.

The Swiss Ramble estimates the club lost around £15m revenue in 2020/21 from a full season of COVID: £6m match day (games behind closed doors) and £9m commercial (conferences and events “heavily restricted”). This takes the total revenue loss over the past two years to £18m.

Revenue has nearly halved since the pre-pandemic £30.3m peak in 2019, falling 45% (£13.6m) to £16.7m. Broadcasting has held up, but match day is down 88% (£5.3m) and commercial has decreased 52% (£8.4m).

CEO Richard Gould said: “The Championship is the competition most affected by the pandemic, across all sports. Football clubs will remain in a precarious position and we will be plugging holes left by the pandemic for perhaps the next four years.”

COVID shrunk Championship transfer market by 90% with Bristol City profit on player sales significantly reducing from £26m to £6m.

£17m revenue is now in the bottom half of the Championship, significantly below clubs with parachute payments, e.g. Norwich City £57m, though others will see similar revenue reductions when they publish 2020/21 accounts with a full season of COVID.

Gould said:Parachute payments are so significant that they are making the Champion ship an unfair competition. Three years’ parachute payments ruin the ability of other clubs to compete.   The longer it goes on with these parachute payments that are out of kilter with the commercial reality of the Championship, the Premier League will just become a closed shop. The door is almost shut now.” This makes it extremely tough for clubs like Bristol City.

Crowds had significantly grown since promotion from League One, rising 87% from 11,681 to 21,809 in 2019/20 (for games played with fans). Their average attendance was 8th highest in the Championship, sandwiched between Cardiff City and Huddersfield Town.

Despite the revenue fall, the wage bill rose £1.8m (6%) from £33.5m to £35.3m, a new club record. Wages have more than doubled (up £18m) since the first season after promotion from League One in 2016, though many players have since been released this summer to cut costs.  Even after this significant growth in the past few years, the £35m wage bill is still only mid-table in the Championship, around half the size of those clubs benefiting from parachute payments.

Directors’ remuneration decreased from £143k to £106k, very much on the low side for the Championship, especially compared to the likes of Birmingham City £1.6m, Fulham £948k, Stoke City £834k and Cardiff City £712k.

Even after the low 2020/21 outlay, Bristol City have significantly increased their gross transfer spend, amounting to £64m in the last 5 years, though they still had £30m net sales, thanks to £94m sales in this period. Only sizeable net spend in last decade was £10m in 2018.

Gross debt rose £22m from £74m to £96m, with £89m of this owed to owner Steve Lansdown (Pula Sports Ltd £72m plus group undertakings £17m). Also included £6.8m interest-free loans from the English Football League and a £0.6m overdraft.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/