Skip to main content

Brentford a model of outperformance

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the 2020/21 accounts of Brentford whose pre-tax loss slightly improved from £9.1m to £8.5m (£2.4m after tax), as profit from player sales rose £19m to £44m and revenue grew £1.4m (10%) from £13.9m to a club record £15.3m.

The £8.5m loss is actually one of the better results in the Championship. Even before the full effects of the pandemic were felt in the 20/21season, many clubs lost more than £20m. In fact, the Bees would have posted a £3.5m profit without the £12m promotion bonus.

Their ability to punch above their weight is amply demonstrated by the fact that their £15m revenue was comfortably in the bottom half of the Championship, only around a quarter of clubs benefiting from parachute payments.   Emphasising their outperformance, their £15m revenue in 2020/21 is the lowest for any Championship club that secured promotion in the last 5 years. Six of those promoted clubs enjoyed revenue over £50m, while three more were above £30m (i.e. twice as much as the Bees).

The Bees have only made an overall profit once in the last 10 years: £24m in 2019, boosted by £14m from the land sale. However, they have managed to keep the magnitude of their losses relatively small, which is no mean feat, given their low turnover.

The evenue increase was driven by broadcasting, up £3.4m (47%) from £7.3m to £10.7m, partly due to deferred TV money from 2019/20, with commercial also up £0.9m (26%) to £4.5m, which offset COVID driven reduction in match day, down £2.9m (95%) to just £155k.

Financials boosted by £44m profit on player sales.  This was the second highest in the Championship to date, only behind Norwich £60m. It was almost three times as much as club’s £15m revenue.  Vhairman Cliff Crown noted that “the club has been heavily reliant on successful player trading”, as evidenced by an impressive £139m profit from player sales in the last 6 seasons (including £96m in the last three years alone).  According to Transfermarkt, Brentford FC have sold players costing £22m for an amazing £174m in the last six years, thereby adding £152m of value via good recruitment and development.

They have needed good player trading profits to offset large operating losses, which have widened from £17m to £53m in the last two years. In fairness, almost every Championship club posts substantial operating losses with half of them being above £30m.

Commercial income rose £0.9m (26%) to £4.5m, as partners stood by the club during the pandemic. New club record, but still on the low side (bottom half of Championship). However, the new stadium will help, so this should further rise to around £10m in the top flight.

The wage bill increased £15m (60%) from £26m to £41m, though that included a £12m promotion bonus. Even if that once-off payment is excluded, wages were up £4m (14%), which means that they have doubled in last 4 years.  Despite the increase, the £41m wage bill was still a fair way below clubs that benefited from parachute payments, whose wages are generally around the £70m level.

The wages to turnover ratio worsened from 186% to 270%, the highest to date in the Championship. Even if £12m promotion bonus were excluded, this metric would have been 192%, though most Championship clubs are well above 100%

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/