Skip to main content

City overtake United in the financial stakes

Manchester City’s annual accounts, published in brief this week, revealed a record-breaking year at the Etihad Stadium.

Total income for 2020-21 stood at £569.8 million in a campaign that ended with defeat to Chelsea in the Champions League final. United, meanwhile, were left trailing in their wake with annual revenues totalling £494 million.

City’s financial growth over the last decade has been unparalleled. A club that failed to even make Deloitte’s Football Money League top 20 for 2006-07, lagging behind Celtic and Marseille, has been transformed since the takeover of Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan with Abu Dhabi’s millions in 2008. From an annual turnover of £87 million in 2008-09 to almost £570 million last season, income has gone up more than six-fold in 12 years.

City’s run to the Champions League final was the undoubted driver for their achievement,  KPMG, the renowned accountancy firm, says that was worth £108 million in prize money from UEFA, while a quirk of timing only increased broadcast streams in the club’s accounts.

Commercial revenue was also up to a new high of £271 million, according to the club’s accounts. An army of 31 global partners, including a host associated with the club’s Abu Dhabi ownership, now work with City and allow them to eclipse United’s reduced commercial income of £232 million.

Put it all together and there might not be a club in world football to trump City’s accounts, which showed a small profit of £2.4 million after the brutal losses of £126 million in the previous calendar year.

A season spent playing behind closed doors did an awful lot more to hurt Manchester United than it did Manchester City, and makes it a slightly misleading picture. In any normal campaign, United can expect to make twice City’s match-day revenue.

“COVID-19 hit United far harder than it hit City,” says Kieran Maguire, the football finance guru. “United would normally make around £110 million from ticket sales in a season. City typically get half of United’s match-day revenue because they’ve got a different fan profile: Fewer corporate fans, fewer international fans.

United have always traditionally been the most attractive option to sponsors. They have the history, the fanbase and the appeal to ensure commercial backers are never in short supply. Those with a cynical eye, of course, will point towards City’s commercial partners and where in the world they are based. They have Etihad Airways as shirt sponsors, and also have link-ups with Visit Abu Dhabi and Expo 2020 Dubai.   There is little question City have maximised opportunities with related parties in the UAE but their on-field success has also brought in significant sums from the likes of Nissan and Nexen Tyres.

United saw a year-on-year fall in commercial revenue but they will point to the make-up of their sponsors, typically blue-chip firms that were exposed to the pandemic, as a reason for the stumble.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do