Skip to main content

Chelsea in danger of shooting themselves in the foot

I have expressed some sympathy for Chelsea in previous posts, or at least for the fans.  I suppose the fans of other clubs feel entitled to some schadenfreude but I don't like the idea of a club with a long history disappearing or being forced to become a non-league club, the potential fate referred to by government sources.

However, the club are in danger of eroding what sympathy there is for them by making unacceptable demands such as suggesting that their FA cup match with Middlesbrough should be played behind closed doors, a request withdrawn after the damage had been done.

It is evident that their stance is annoying government ministers who admittedly have their own agenda in terms of making a high profile example of Roman Abramovich.

Ministers are reported to be increasingly irritated by Chelsea's complaints about the licence conditions imposed on them, warning that the club was on 'borrowed time' and would have collapsed altogether without the special licence.  One senior government source said that after years of benefitting from Abramovich's ownership, the club was now paying the price.

The government has said that it will not back down on its refusal to allow the club to sell more tickets, but will consider some changes to the licence if they qualify for the FA Cup semi-finals and the Champions League quarter finals.

A further challenge is that the EU have now imposed sanctions against Abramovich.  While the Champions League match against Lille will go ahead, it is unclear how future matches will be affected.

There is a certain amount of hypocrisy in current criticisms of some foreign owners with football asked to adhere to moral standards than the Government.   As far as Newcastle United and Saudi Arabia are concerned, it should be remembered that we sell arms to that country, allegedly used in the conflict in Yemen.  It is also all right for the prime minister to go there and ask for the oil taps to be turned on.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Unknown16 March 2022 at 04:33

    Who ever takes over from chelsea has to be fully checked as we don't want the same mess that we are in now to show its ugly head again 12 months down the line as people are questioning other owners of other clubs

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more