'Fans' friend' Broughton sets out his Chelsea stall

Consortium front man Martin Broughton talked to Radio 5 this morning about a bid for Chelsea that is said to be favoured by the Government.

Former British Airways chairman Broughton was credited by government officials with rescuing Liverpool from a dire financial situation under George Gillett and Tom Hicks and then facilitating the arrival of Fenway Sports Group in 2010.

Future prospective director Lord Coe, also a lifelong fan, is seen as a 'good egg' because of his Olympics work. He is a former Conservative MP and was an aide to former Tory leader Lord Hague. Coe has advised Chelsea on strategy ín the past and enjoys a good relationship with key personnel at the Bridge.

Broughton said, ‘ It’s a fan led consortium, I’ve been a fan since 1965, I have a passion about it. We put together a group of like-minded, highly capitalised people to keep it at the level it is today.’

The Interviewer read out the club’s impressive record under Roman Abramovich asking ‘that is the continued trajectory?’ Broughton: ‘That’s where we want to stay.’

The interviewer aske where is money coming from? ‘We could buy the club tomorrow, the money is coming from around the world.’ [This is perhaps understandably vague about who the backers are]. Broughton referred to the Tracey Crouch route requiring involvement of ‘community’ fans.

[The only known partners are Creative Artists Agency, a global talent management agency and Evolution Media Capital, a sports advisory and financial partnership].

The interviewer asked about the return, pointing out that the club just about breaks even after £1.5bn put in the outgoing owner. Broughton said they were not looking for dividends but for long-term capital growth. [This makes sense]. The value of the club will go up over time. Even if one member of the consortium decides to sell their share.

Broughton: ‘This is very largely equity based, we will use a little bit of debt, there is the stadium issue.' He set out the three familiar options: moving; demolition and rebuild; gradually rebuild. ‘All three are expensive and complex. There’s no easy answer.’ The interviewer pointed out that this would limit the return.

Broughton said they had talked with the Supporters’ Trust. The fans wanted a golden share and a shadow board as recommended by Crouch. A seat on the board was a possible alternative. [In my view and experience that doesn’t work well because of commercial confidentiality issues which limit feedback to fans].

The interviewer raised short term concerns about a exodus of players. Broughton: ‘ Funding is there immediately. Don’t know how long the process is going to take. [Early April is a target date, but it will probably take longer]. Tuchel is a star. I am a fan.’ The interviewer said this depended on how Tuchel looked at the situation.

Do they have the readies?

My concern if I was a Chelsea fan is that the Broughton consortium may look squeaky clean and fan facing, but do they have as many readies as some of their competitors? Backed by Clearview Capital, the Boehly Group appear to have more funds at their disposal than any other bidders. In this respect look formidable and would be able both to secure key players and fund the much needed development of Stamford Bridge.

However, their declared provisions for fan involvement are less well developed. Chelsea fan Lord Daniel Finkeltstein would be appointed to the board. He is a former aide to Conservative leaders including Dave Cameron so The Times columnist at least ticks that box.

Why so many American bidders?

The Financial Times Scoreboard comments: 'don’t discount the pull and prestige of west London, home to Chelsea’s home stadium of Stamford Bridge, and a far more attractive location to finance types than the north London homes of city rivals Arsenal and Tottenham. In the words of one well-connected source, the question isn’t really why America’s 1 per cent want to buy a Premier League team: “It’s like a house in Nantucket — how do you not have one?”'

I think it's more to do with the fact that sports franchises rarely come on the market in the US and those that do are often problematic expansion franchises. If a top six club becomes available, it's bound to attract interest.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful. Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy). However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch. Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog