Skip to main content

The sky is blue for Coventry City

In his latest analysis of a club’s accounts the authoritative Swiss Ramble features the Football League club geographically closest to me, Coventry City.   Better times are here for the Sky Blues on the pitch.  They are back in the Coventry Building Society stadium (formerly the Ricoh).   There is discussion about a possible future move to a stadium built on land owned by Warwick University.

Coventry City’s 2020/21 accounts saw the loss widen from £3.4m to £4.7m, due to squad investment after promotion to the Championship. Revenue rose £6.7m to ££11.8m, despite COVID, but expenses up £6.5m and player sales down £1.9m.

Some good news in the accounts

Coventry £4.7m loss is actually one of the better results in the Championship, much better than the likes of Bristol City £38m, Reading £36m and Middlesbrough £31m in 2020/21. They did well to restrict the size of the deficit, given there was a full year of the pandemic.

Coventry have only reported a profit once in the last 10 years – and that was just £13k in 2019. That said, they have managed to keep the losses low with their conservative model, averaging less than £3m a season since 2015.

The good news is that Coventry have secured two promotions in recent years and are competing strongly in the Championship. However, given their financial disadvantages compared to most other clubs, they would have to punch well above their weight to reach the play-offs.

Coventry loss widened from £3.4m to £4.7m, which club said was “not unexpected”, due to increased investment in the squad after promotion. Revenue rose £6.7m from £5.1m to £11.8m, despite COVID impact, but expenses increased £6.5m and profit on player sales halved to £1.9m.

Despite the impact of the pandemic, Coventry revenue has tripled to £11.8m from the £3.8m low in League One to 2014. This is also higher than the £10.8m generated the last time the club was in the Championship in 2012.

Even after this growth, Coventry £11.8m revenue is lowest in the Championship, just below Barnsley, Millwall and Preston. To highlight their challenge, this is around a fifth of clubs benefiting from parachute payments which have a severe distorting effect in the Championship.

Coventry revenue increase was mainly due to higher broadcasting money in the Championship. This rose £7.2m from £1.7m to £8.9m, while commercial was also up £0.8m (44%) from £1.9m to £2.7m. Playing behind closed doors meant match day fell £1.2m from £1.5m to just £0.3m.

Coventry have not made much money from player sales, as these have only generated £22m in the last decade, though nearly half of that (£10m) came in the last three years. This season will also be on the low side.

Coventry average attendance this season is just over 19,000, which is three times as much as 6,677 two years ago, largely due to the club returning to Coventry instead of having to play games at St Andrews in Birmingham. This is 7th highest in the Championship.

The wage bill

Coventry wage bill doubled from £6.5m to £13.2m, due to contractual increases following promotion together with bonuses for winning League One. This is £3m higher than the last time the club was in the Championship in 2012.   Even after this growth Coventry £13m wage bill was still one of the lowest in the Championship. To put this into perspective, this is over £50m less than clubs with parachute payments.

Coventry wages to turnover ratio decreased (improved) from 128% to 111%. This would have been better without COVID revenue loss, but is still one of the lowest in the Championship, where most clubs have ratios well above 100% (four more than 200%).

Coventry spent £3.5m on player purchases, which was their highest for many years, including Gustavo Hamer, is relatively small for Championship, but only just below Nottingham Forest.

Debt and the owners

Coventry gross debt rose £2m from £39m to £41m, mainly £39m from the owners (SISU Capital and Arvo) plus £2m from the EFL. The club also includes £11m interest on the loans in accruals, which would give a total of £51m outstanding.Coventry £41m gross debt is not that large for the Championship, far below the likes of Stoke City £187m, Blackburn Rovers £156m, Middlesbrough £129m and Birmingham City £116m.

In the last 10 years Coventry’s available cash has come from the owners £19m, player sales £16m and sale of a subsidiary £5m. This has very largely been used to cover £32m operating losses with very little spent on infrastructure or interest payments.

The owners have provided £25m funding in the last 11 years, though almost all of that came between 2011 and 2014 with only £3m since then. SISU saved the club from administration in 2007, but have come under fire from supporters for their frugal approach

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...