Skip to main content

The sky is blue for Coventry City

In his latest analysis of a club’s accounts the authoritative Swiss Ramble features the Football League club geographically closest to me, Coventry City.   Better times are here for the Sky Blues on the pitch.  They are back in the Coventry Building Society stadium (formerly the Ricoh).   There is discussion about a possible future move to a stadium built on land owned by Warwick University.

Coventry City’s 2020/21 accounts saw the loss widen from £3.4m to £4.7m, due to squad investment after promotion to the Championship. Revenue rose £6.7m to ££11.8m, despite COVID, but expenses up £6.5m and player sales down £1.9m.

Some good news in the accounts

Coventry £4.7m loss is actually one of the better results in the Championship, much better than the likes of Bristol City £38m, Reading £36m and Middlesbrough £31m in 2020/21. They did well to restrict the size of the deficit, given there was a full year of the pandemic.

Coventry have only reported a profit once in the last 10 years – and that was just £13k in 2019. That said, they have managed to keep the losses low with their conservative model, averaging less than £3m a season since 2015.

The good news is that Coventry have secured two promotions in recent years and are competing strongly in the Championship. However, given their financial disadvantages compared to most other clubs, they would have to punch well above their weight to reach the play-offs.

Coventry loss widened from £3.4m to £4.7m, which club said was “not unexpected”, due to increased investment in the squad after promotion. Revenue rose £6.7m from £5.1m to £11.8m, despite COVID impact, but expenses increased £6.5m and profit on player sales halved to £1.9m.

Despite the impact of the pandemic, Coventry revenue has tripled to £11.8m from the £3.8m low in League One to 2014. This is also higher than the £10.8m generated the last time the club was in the Championship in 2012.

Even after this growth, Coventry £11.8m revenue is lowest in the Championship, just below Barnsley, Millwall and Preston. To highlight their challenge, this is around a fifth of clubs benefiting from parachute payments which have a severe distorting effect in the Championship.

Coventry revenue increase was mainly due to higher broadcasting money in the Championship. This rose £7.2m from £1.7m to £8.9m, while commercial was also up £0.8m (44%) from £1.9m to £2.7m. Playing behind closed doors meant match day fell £1.2m from £1.5m to just £0.3m.

Coventry have not made much money from player sales, as these have only generated £22m in the last decade, though nearly half of that (£10m) came in the last three years. This season will also be on the low side.

Coventry average attendance this season is just over 19,000, which is three times as much as 6,677 two years ago, largely due to the club returning to Coventry instead of having to play games at St Andrews in Birmingham. This is 7th highest in the Championship.

The wage bill

Coventry wage bill doubled from £6.5m to £13.2m, due to contractual increases following promotion together with bonuses for winning League One. This is £3m higher than the last time the club was in the Championship in 2012.   Even after this growth Coventry £13m wage bill was still one of the lowest in the Championship. To put this into perspective, this is over £50m less than clubs with parachute payments.

Coventry wages to turnover ratio decreased (improved) from 128% to 111%. This would have been better without COVID revenue loss, but is still one of the lowest in the Championship, where most clubs have ratios well above 100% (four more than 200%).

Coventry spent £3.5m on player purchases, which was their highest for many years, including Gustavo Hamer, is relatively small for Championship, but only just below Nottingham Forest.

Debt and the owners

Coventry gross debt rose £2m from £39m to £41m, mainly £39m from the owners (SISU Capital and Arvo) plus £2m from the EFL. The club also includes £11m interest on the loans in accruals, which would give a total of £51m outstanding.Coventry £41m gross debt is not that large for the Championship, far below the likes of Stoke City £187m, Blackburn Rovers £156m, Middlesbrough £129m and Birmingham City £116m.

In the last 10 years Coventry’s available cash has come from the owners £19m, player sales £16m and sale of a subsidiary £5m. This has very largely been used to cover £32m operating losses with very little spent on infrastructure or interest payments.

The owners have provided £25m funding in the last 11 years, though almost all of that came between 2011 and 2014 with only £3m since then. SISU saved the club from administration in 2007, but have come under fire from supporters for their frugal approach

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/