Skip to main content

How much a difference does the manager make?

[This is an edited version of an article that originally appeared in the Charlton fanzine, Voice of the Valley.   Almost all references to Charlton have been excised].

In his excellent book The Football Manager: a History Neil Carter shows how managers often started out as the club secretary with the board selecting the team.  Gradually they achieved greater responsibilities.  He argues that Herbert Chapman at Arsenal was the most important figure in the development of modern football management.   The other two key pioneers were Frank Buckley at Wolves and Jimmy Seed at Charlton.

Carter points out how football and the role of the manager changed after 1992.  Success on the pitch became even more important commercially making football even more of a results business.  Managers assumed a much higher profile in the media.

In modern football the manager is generally seen as being responsible for everything that occurs on the pitch.   Whether the influence of video games plays any part is far from clear but it seems that some fans actually think the manager is controlling the movement of the players and their ability to anticipate threats and opportunities.

Football has improved

What is often overlooked is that football in general is incomparably better compared with the past.  Pitches, training, nutrition and health standards and consequently athleticism have improved beyond recognition. 

In a recent book on football in the 1970s Jon Spurling avoids sepia-tinged nostalgia about footballers walking or catching the bus to the ground.     Instead he recalls in the words of one reviewer:  ‘Bungs. Racism.  The National Front.  Hooliganism.  Insanitary, dangerous stadiums with a terrible view and drunk men urinating where they stood. Crappy mud-bath pitches. Brutal, deliberate career-ending tackles. Mindless booze-fuelled violence — and that was just the players.  There were hardly any live games on the telly. Lump it forward to the big bloke up front, hope to nick one late doors away from home, then get back on the coach and on the piss.’

However, the expectations of fans and owners have risen, leading to a rise in managerial turnover.  Not everyone changes managers as often as Watford!  Of course, there is no point in holding on to a manager who is not up to the taskDoes the manager actually make a difference?   There is now a lot of statistical evidence on this which I review in my book Political Football.   In general the answer is not as much as you would expect.  There certainly is often a new manager bounce, but that doesn’t persist for long.  With managerial tenures declining, managers are often faced with players who don’t fit the system they want to play.

World class managers

There are, however, truly exceptional world class managers who do really make a difference.   Four immediately come to mind. Although he has considerable resources at his disposal, Pep Guardiola is in my view a genius.  Jurgen Klopp has transformed the fortunes of Liverpool while a series of managers have not been able to get a grip on Everton despite generous funding. 

 Sir Alex Ferguson’s skill was to start building a new team when he already had a great one (and apparently influencing referees to provide ‘Fergie time’ and not award penalties against United).   Arsene Wenger was greeted as Arsene Who by bemused Arsenal fans, but he quickly showed he was ahead of the curve in all aspects of the game.   Over time, however, he was overtaken by younger managers.   The game does not stand still.

At lower levels, there are examples of managers who allow teams to punch above their weight.   John Coleman has managed nearly one thousand games for Accrington Stanley.  Despite small crowds they have an enviable home record in League One.

In praise of non-league managers

I would also like to nominate the manager of my non-league club, Leamington.  Paul Holleran recently celebrated 600 games in charge.   Leamington is a community club without a rich benefactor and generally limited attendances at its ground hidden in the Warwickshire countryside but it remains a competitor in tier two of the non-league system. 

This is partly because Holleran has an excellent contacts book that allows him to bring in Football League players on loan or recruit from their academies.   The result has been a production line of players for Leagues One and Two or richer non-league clubs.  An example would be Colby Bishop who has been a handful for Charlton when we have played Accrington Stanley.    The transfer fees help keep the club afloat.

It is often argued that the manager has to motivate the players and it has even been suggested that this or that manager ‘lost the dressing room’, no doubt by people who have never been near the dressing room. I am always a bit puzzled by this talk about motivating players.   Presumably they want to be professional footballers and are paid well to play.  It is surely in the interests of their future careers to do their best.   However, it has to be admitted that psychological factors can play a part and confidence is an elusive but key concept in the game.

It’s not all down to the manager.   The players, and the crowd, have to play their part.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do