Skip to main content

How much a difference does the manager make?

[This is an edited version of an article that originally appeared in the Charlton fanzine, Voice of the Valley.   Almost all references to Charlton have been excised].

In his excellent book The Football Manager: a History Neil Carter shows how managers often started out as the club secretary with the board selecting the team.  Gradually they achieved greater responsibilities.  He argues that Herbert Chapman at Arsenal was the most important figure in the development of modern football management.   The other two key pioneers were Frank Buckley at Wolves and Jimmy Seed at Charlton.

Carter points out how football and the role of the manager changed after 1992.  Success on the pitch became even more important commercially making football even more of a results business.  Managers assumed a much higher profile in the media.

In modern football the manager is generally seen as being responsible for everything that occurs on the pitch.   Whether the influence of video games plays any part is far from clear but it seems that some fans actually think the manager is controlling the movement of the players and their ability to anticipate threats and opportunities.

Football has improved

What is often overlooked is that football in general is incomparably better compared with the past.  Pitches, training, nutrition and health standards and consequently athleticism have improved beyond recognition. 

In a recent book on football in the 1970s Jon Spurling avoids sepia-tinged nostalgia about footballers walking or catching the bus to the ground.     Instead he recalls in the words of one reviewer:  ‘Bungs. Racism.  The National Front.  Hooliganism.  Insanitary, dangerous stadiums with a terrible view and drunk men urinating where they stood. Crappy mud-bath pitches. Brutal, deliberate career-ending tackles. Mindless booze-fuelled violence — and that was just the players.  There were hardly any live games on the telly. Lump it forward to the big bloke up front, hope to nick one late doors away from home, then get back on the coach and on the piss.’

However, the expectations of fans and owners have risen, leading to a rise in managerial turnover.  Not everyone changes managers as often as Watford!  Of course, there is no point in holding on to a manager who is not up to the taskDoes the manager actually make a difference?   There is now a lot of statistical evidence on this which I review in my book Political Football.   In general the answer is not as much as you would expect.  There certainly is often a new manager bounce, but that doesn’t persist for long.  With managerial tenures declining, managers are often faced with players who don’t fit the system they want to play.

World class managers

There are, however, truly exceptional world class managers who do really make a difference.   Four immediately come to mind. Although he has considerable resources at his disposal, Pep Guardiola is in my view a genius.  Jurgen Klopp has transformed the fortunes of Liverpool while a series of managers have not been able to get a grip on Everton despite generous funding. 

 Sir Alex Ferguson’s skill was to start building a new team when he already had a great one (and apparently influencing referees to provide ‘Fergie time’ and not award penalties against United).   Arsene Wenger was greeted as Arsene Who by bemused Arsenal fans, but he quickly showed he was ahead of the curve in all aspects of the game.   Over time, however, he was overtaken by younger managers.   The game does not stand still.

At lower levels, there are examples of managers who allow teams to punch above their weight.   John Coleman has managed nearly one thousand games for Accrington Stanley.  Despite small crowds they have an enviable home record in League One.

In praise of non-league managers

I would also like to nominate the manager of my non-league club, Leamington.  Paul Holleran recently celebrated 600 games in charge.   Leamington is a community club without a rich benefactor and generally limited attendances at its ground hidden in the Warwickshire countryside but it remains a competitor in tier two of the non-league system. 

This is partly because Holleran has an excellent contacts book that allows him to bring in Football League players on loan or recruit from their academies.   The result has been a production line of players for Leagues One and Two or richer non-league clubs.  An example would be Colby Bishop who has been a handful for Charlton when we have played Accrington Stanley.    The transfer fees help keep the club afloat.

It is often argued that the manager has to motivate the players and it has even been suggested that this or that manager ‘lost the dressing room’, no doubt by people who have never been near the dressing room. I am always a bit puzzled by this talk about motivating players.   Presumably they want to be professional footballers and are paid well to play.  It is surely in the interests of their future careers to do their best.   However, it has to be admitted that psychological factors can play a part and confidence is an elusive but key concept in the game.

It’s not all down to the manager.   The players, and the crowd, have to play their part.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl