Skip to main content

Leeds turn a profit

What does the Swiss Ramble do at the weekends?   Does he leave Zurich to ski or walk in the mountains?   Does he go for yodelling lessons?   No, he tirelessly works away at interpreting a club’s latest accounts and this week it is the turn of Leeds United.   He tweets his findings rather than putting them in a blog format, so I consolidate them so that more can benefit from his insights.

I have argued that for many years a vibrant regional capital like Leeds deserved to be represented in the top flight.  The Swiss Ramble states: ‘Promotion to the Premier League has clearly transformed Leeds finances, even when impacted by COVID (though the loan write-off also helped). Leeds enjoy a structural competitive advantage from being the only club in UK’s third biggest city, leading to good commercial prospects.’

2nd highest profit in Premier League

Leeds swung from a £62m pre-tax loss in the Championship to £26m profit in the Premier League, thanks to revenue more than tripling from £54m to club record £171m, though competing in the top flight increased expenses by a third (£44)m. Bottom line boosted by £21m loan write-off.

The 2021 £26m profit is the first they have reported since 2017 – and that was only £1m. Losses had been increasing following the arrival of owner Andrea Radrizzani, as Leeds invested big sums to help secure promotion, leading to £84m deficit in the previous two years.

£26m profit is 2nd highest in the Premier League, only below Wolves £145m (£127m loan write-off). Even if Leeds’ £21m waived loan were excluded, net profit would still be £5m. A full year of the pandemic meant some very high losses, e.g. Chelsea £156m, Arsenal £127m.

Leeds were one of only two Premier League clubs to make an operating profit in 2021 (excluding player sales and loan waiver) with their £6m surplus a significant improvement on £65m loss in the Championship.

Big growth in revenue

The £171m revenue is six times as much as 2015 £24m low in the Championship. Obviously most of the growth has been driven by broadcasting, up £129m due to PL TV deal, but commercial has also increased £25m to £36m. It would have been higher without COVID fall in gate receipts.

Club revenue is the 12th highest in the Premier League, sandwiched between Villa £184m and Saints  £157m. Despite the growth it’s still less than a third of Man City£570m.

£171m revenue was enough to secure them 23rd place in the Deloitte Money League, which ranks clubs globally. This put them just behind Sevilla £177m, who have won the Europa League six times, but ahead of AS Roma £169m and Atalanta £166m.

Main driver of the £117m revenue increase was broadcasting, up £124m from £9m to £133m, due to much more lucrative Premier League TV deal, though commercial also grew £2m (6%) to £36m. This offset the COVID driven reduction in gate receipts, down £10m (83%) to just £1.9m.

Broadcasting income shot up by £124m from £9m to £133m, the club’s highest ever from this revenue stream. Although they did not benefit from revenue deferrals in the same way as other clubs, their merit payment was boosted by Bielsa guiding them to 9th.

Commercial income rose £2m (6%) from to £36m, mainly driven by merchandising sales, up a third from £15m to £20m. It would have been higher without £4m fall in catering (due to COVID). Even so, it is the 9th highest in the Premier League, though £100m below 6th placed Arsenal.

COVID meant that the clb lost £22.8m profits in 2020/21, due to significant losses in match day (ticketing, concessions & hospitality), stadium events and conference & banqueting.

Player sales and spending

The profit would have been even higher if they had sold some of their talent. As it was, profit on player sales fell from £10m to a £1m loss. Unsurprisingly, this was the worst player trading result in the Premier League, miles below Man City £69m.

Leeds have made very little from player sales, actually registering a £1m loss in 2021. Their £51m profit in last 5 years is on the low side for the Premier League (though in Championship for most of that time). It will be similar this season, as departures mainly free transfers.

The club spent £99m on player purchases, as they “invested significantly” to bring in Rodrigo from Valencia, Diego Llorente from Real Sociedad, Rapinha from Rennes and Robin Koch from Freiburg. This was 8th highest in the Premier League as the club strived to be competitive.  Radrizzani has loosened the purse strings at Leeds since his arrival, leading to gross transfer spend of £195m in the last 5 years (£145m in last 2 years alone), compared to only £21m in the preceding 5-year period. Still very low compared to other Premier League clubs.

Average attendance of 35,321 (for games played with fans) was comfortably the best in the Championship and would have placed them above half the clubs in the Premier League.

Leeds signed “record-breaking” new sponsorship deals in 2020/21. Betting firm SBOBET shirt sponsorship is worth £6.5m a year, while Adidas replaced Kappa in a five-year kit supplier deal, reportedly as high as £10m. Sleeve sponsor JD Sports and training kit partnership with Clipper.

Wages and debt

Wages rose significantly by £30m (38%) from £78m (including £20m promotion bonus) to £108m, so they are 5 times as much as £21m just 4 years ago. Only covers 11 months, so would have been £118m on an annualised basis, which means 63% growth on an underlying basis.

Despite the increase, the £108m wage bill is the second lowest in 2020/21 Premier League to date. Even if we take the £118m wages (for annualised 12 months) this would still place them firmly in the bottom half of the table.

The wages to turnover ratio decreased (improved) from 144% to 63%, the club’s lowest for five years and one of the best in the Premier League. It would obviously be higher if the wage bill covered 12 months; on the other hand, ratio was adversely impacted by COVID revenue losses.

Gross debt rose £17m from £38m to £55m, including £34m external loans (secured on TV money), £20m from related parties and £1m finance leases. Would have been higher without the owners waiving £21m of loans and converting £8m of debt to capital in 2021 (£28m since 2015).

By the Swiss Ramble’s  calculations, Leeds have no problems with Premier League’s Profitability & Sustainability rules, as their losses over 3-year monitoring period are well within the limit after making allowable deductions for academy, community & infrastructure, promotion bonus & COVID impact.

Sources of funds

In the last decade Leeds have received £127m funding from various owners (£55m share capital and £71m loans). This has mainly been spent on players £50m (net), capital expenditure £29m, funding operating losses £21m and £8m interest.

Most of the owner funding has come in the last five years, though the £91m provided is not that high in the Premier League. Over that period those with the highest financing are aspirational clubs similar to Leeds, e.g. Everton £448m, Villa £400m and Fulham £347m.



4


4


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do