Skip to main content

Leeds turn a profit

What does the Swiss Ramble do at the weekends?   Does he leave Zurich to ski or walk in the mountains?   Does he go for yodelling lessons?   No, he tirelessly works away at interpreting a club’s latest accounts and this week it is the turn of Leeds United.   He tweets his findings rather than putting them in a blog format, so I consolidate them so that more can benefit from his insights.

I have argued that for many years a vibrant regional capital like Leeds deserved to be represented in the top flight.  The Swiss Ramble states: ‘Promotion to the Premier League has clearly transformed Leeds finances, even when impacted by COVID (though the loan write-off also helped). Leeds enjoy a structural competitive advantage from being the only club in UK’s third biggest city, leading to good commercial prospects.’

2nd highest profit in Premier League

Leeds swung from a £62m pre-tax loss in the Championship to £26m profit in the Premier League, thanks to revenue more than tripling from £54m to club record £171m, though competing in the top flight increased expenses by a third (£44)m. Bottom line boosted by £21m loan write-off.

The 2021 £26m profit is the first they have reported since 2017 – and that was only £1m. Losses had been increasing following the arrival of owner Andrea Radrizzani, as Leeds invested big sums to help secure promotion, leading to £84m deficit in the previous two years.

£26m profit is 2nd highest in the Premier League, only below Wolves £145m (£127m loan write-off). Even if Leeds’ £21m waived loan were excluded, net profit would still be £5m. A full year of the pandemic meant some very high losses, e.g. Chelsea £156m, Arsenal £127m.

Leeds were one of only two Premier League clubs to make an operating profit in 2021 (excluding player sales and loan waiver) with their £6m surplus a significant improvement on £65m loss in the Championship.

Big growth in revenue

The £171m revenue is six times as much as 2015 £24m low in the Championship. Obviously most of the growth has been driven by broadcasting, up £129m due to PL TV deal, but commercial has also increased £25m to £36m. It would have been higher without COVID fall in gate receipts.

Club revenue is the 12th highest in the Premier League, sandwiched between Villa £184m and Saints  £157m. Despite the growth it’s still less than a third of Man City£570m.

£171m revenue was enough to secure them 23rd place in the Deloitte Money League, which ranks clubs globally. This put them just behind Sevilla £177m, who have won the Europa League six times, but ahead of AS Roma £169m and Atalanta £166m.

Main driver of the £117m revenue increase was broadcasting, up £124m from £9m to £133m, due to much more lucrative Premier League TV deal, though commercial also grew £2m (6%) to £36m. This offset the COVID driven reduction in gate receipts, down £10m (83%) to just £1.9m.

Broadcasting income shot up by £124m from £9m to £133m, the club’s highest ever from this revenue stream. Although they did not benefit from revenue deferrals in the same way as other clubs, their merit payment was boosted by Bielsa guiding them to 9th.

Commercial income rose £2m (6%) from to £36m, mainly driven by merchandising sales, up a third from £15m to £20m. It would have been higher without £4m fall in catering (due to COVID). Even so, it is the 9th highest in the Premier League, though £100m below 6th placed Arsenal.

COVID meant that the clb lost £22.8m profits in 2020/21, due to significant losses in match day (ticketing, concessions & hospitality), stadium events and conference & banqueting.

Player sales and spending

The profit would have been even higher if they had sold some of their talent. As it was, profit on player sales fell from £10m to a £1m loss. Unsurprisingly, this was the worst player trading result in the Premier League, miles below Man City £69m.

Leeds have made very little from player sales, actually registering a £1m loss in 2021. Their £51m profit in last 5 years is on the low side for the Premier League (though in Championship for most of that time). It will be similar this season, as departures mainly free transfers.

The club spent £99m on player purchases, as they “invested significantly” to bring in Rodrigo from Valencia, Diego Llorente from Real Sociedad, Rapinha from Rennes and Robin Koch from Freiburg. This was 8th highest in the Premier League as the club strived to be competitive.  Radrizzani has loosened the purse strings at Leeds since his arrival, leading to gross transfer spend of £195m in the last 5 years (£145m in last 2 years alone), compared to only £21m in the preceding 5-year period. Still very low compared to other Premier League clubs.

Average attendance of 35,321 (for games played with fans) was comfortably the best in the Championship and would have placed them above half the clubs in the Premier League.

Leeds signed “record-breaking” new sponsorship deals in 2020/21. Betting firm SBOBET shirt sponsorship is worth £6.5m a year, while Adidas replaced Kappa in a five-year kit supplier deal, reportedly as high as £10m. Sleeve sponsor JD Sports and training kit partnership with Clipper.

Wages and debt

Wages rose significantly by £30m (38%) from £78m (including £20m promotion bonus) to £108m, so they are 5 times as much as £21m just 4 years ago. Only covers 11 months, so would have been £118m on an annualised basis, which means 63% growth on an underlying basis.

Despite the increase, the £108m wage bill is the second lowest in 2020/21 Premier League to date. Even if we take the £118m wages (for annualised 12 months) this would still place them firmly in the bottom half of the table.

The wages to turnover ratio decreased (improved) from 144% to 63%, the club’s lowest for five years and one of the best in the Premier League. It would obviously be higher if the wage bill covered 12 months; on the other hand, ratio was adversely impacted by COVID revenue losses.

Gross debt rose £17m from £38m to £55m, including £34m external loans (secured on TV money), £20m from related parties and £1m finance leases. Would have been higher without the owners waiving £21m of loans and converting £8m of debt to capital in 2021 (£28m since 2015).

By the Swiss Ramble’s  calculations, Leeds have no problems with Premier League’s Profitability & Sustainability rules, as their losses over 3-year monitoring period are well within the limit after making allowable deductions for academy, community & infrastructure, promotion bonus & COVID impact.

Sources of funds

In the last decade Leeds have received £127m funding from various owners (£55m share capital and £71m loans). This has mainly been spent on players £50m (net), capital expenditure £29m, funding operating losses £21m and £8m interest.

Most of the owner funding has come in the last five years, though the £91m provided is not that high in the Premier League. Over that period those with the highest financing are aspirational clubs similar to Leeds, e.g. Everton £448m, Villa £400m and Fulham £347m.



4


4


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/