Skip to main content

What is a big club?

This is a shortened version of an article that originally appeared in the Charlton fanzine, Voice of the Valley.

We are constantly told that football is all about opinions, although in practice modern recruitment and coaching is increasingly driven by in depth data analysis.   However, some of the debate surrounding football uses terminology in a rather loose way, perhaps once again demonstrating that it is a unique part of society and the economy.

One example which is the theme of this article is the use of the term ‘big’ club.  It is unclear what qualifies a club to be described as ‘big’, other than in the eyes of its supporters who are always ready to claim the title.   Some supporters say their club is 'massive'.

The top six

In reality the only clubs that are truly massive are the ‘top’ or ‘big’ six that dominate the Premier League and English entry to the Champions League (Arsenal, Tottenham Hotspur, Liverpool, Chelsea and the two Manchester clubs).   

If we go back to the first 38-game Premier League season, 1995-96, and trawl through the years between then and now, two trends emerge. The first is that the top six have been steadily accumulating more points (an average of 75 per club over the last 10 seasons, compared to 70 per club over the competition’s first 10 seasons). The second is that the bottom three are picking up fewer points (an average of 30 per club over the last 10 seasons, compared to 33 over the first 10 seasons).    Focus only on the last five seasons and the pattern is even more marked in both cases.

Membership of the top six is not immutable and Tottenham Hotspur have had difficulty in winning silverware.    However, the financial gap between the top six and other clubs has been growing.   West Ham has aspirations to break into the top six and have been enjoying success on the pitch.  Their £193m revenue is currently 7th highest in the Premier League. It has increased by £72m (60%) since 2015, which is pretty good, but the problem is that the Big Six has seen even more growth, e.g. Spurs £164m and Chelsea £121m, so the gap has still widened.

Everton was one of the clubs involved in forming the Premier League and were then seen as a top club.  Since Farhad Moshiri’s arrival, they have spent big in the transfer market (until last summer). In the four seasons up to 2020, they splashed out a chunky £566m gross spend (£294m net). 

In fact, in the five years up to 2020, Everton’s £350m owner funding was the highest in the Premier League, but decision-making about both managers and players has often been poor.  Everton's revenue is the eighth highest in the top flight, it’s still far below the leading clubs, e.g. Manchester United’s £590m is three times as much, while Liverpool 2016/17 £364m was almost double.

What makes a club big?

Leaving aside the very top clubs, how can one decide whether a club is big?   Some clubs would accept the badge of ‘small’ as a mark of pride given their level of achievement.    That could apply to Burton Albion and Fleetwood Town in League One.  It looks as if Cheltenham Town and Forest Green Rovers will be able to play the famed ‘El Glosico’ in League One next season.    Neither club would claim to be big; indeed Forest Green has built its image around its ecological commitment.

I think that there are three criteria that could be used to help decide whether a club is ‘big’: attendance, ground capacity and league record.    Attendances fascinate fans, but the statistics are very unreliable.   In days gone by, before the creation of current levels of security, it was often possible to sneak into a ground without paying.    There were also allegations that clubs understated the attendance and revenue to reduce their entertainment tax liability.

Stadium size could be a criterion. Many clubs have invested in their stadiums in recent years, often to add additional corporate capacity in the top flight.   Some have moved to new sites, West Ham getting a particularly good deal on the London Stadium.  Everton’s hopes for revival are pinned on their new stadium.   Tottenham Hotspur probably have the most Impressive and flexible new stadium but such investments can load a club with considerable debt.   

Bournemouth have not expanded their stadium, because of difficulties with the ground owners, although when they were in the Premier League this meant they were more reliant that any other club on broadcasting revenue.   Too rapid a stadium expansion can lead to empty spaces and a lack of atmosphere when relegation occurs.

How long a club has spent in the top flight may be seen as a hallmark of a big club, although calculations are affected by whether or not one thinks that football started with the creation of the Premier League.   One might also factor in FA Cup success, although these days achievement in the Champions League is arguably more important.

Perhaps, at the end of the day, it's all a matter of opinions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/