Skip to main content

What is a big club?

This is a shortened version of an article that originally appeared in the Charlton fanzine, Voice of the Valley.

We are constantly told that football is all about opinions, although in practice modern recruitment and coaching is increasingly driven by in depth data analysis.   However, some of the debate surrounding football uses terminology in a rather loose way, perhaps once again demonstrating that it is a unique part of society and the economy.

One example which is the theme of this article is the use of the term ‘big’ club.  It is unclear what qualifies a club to be described as ‘big’, other than in the eyes of its supporters who are always ready to claim the title.   Some supporters say their club is 'massive'.

The top six

In reality the only clubs that are truly massive are the ‘top’ or ‘big’ six that dominate the Premier League and English entry to the Champions League (Arsenal, Tottenham Hotspur, Liverpool, Chelsea and the two Manchester clubs).   

If we go back to the first 38-game Premier League season, 1995-96, and trawl through the years between then and now, two trends emerge. The first is that the top six have been steadily accumulating more points (an average of 75 per club over the last 10 seasons, compared to 70 per club over the competition’s first 10 seasons). The second is that the bottom three are picking up fewer points (an average of 30 per club over the last 10 seasons, compared to 33 over the first 10 seasons).    Focus only on the last five seasons and the pattern is even more marked in both cases.

Membership of the top six is not immutable and Tottenham Hotspur have had difficulty in winning silverware.    However, the financial gap between the top six and other clubs has been growing.   West Ham has aspirations to break into the top six and have been enjoying success on the pitch.  Their £193m revenue is currently 7th highest in the Premier League. It has increased by £72m (60%) since 2015, which is pretty good, but the problem is that the Big Six has seen even more growth, e.g. Spurs £164m and Chelsea £121m, so the gap has still widened.

Everton was one of the clubs involved in forming the Premier League and were then seen as a top club.  Since Farhad Moshiri’s arrival, they have spent big in the transfer market (until last summer). In the four seasons up to 2020, they splashed out a chunky £566m gross spend (£294m net). 

In fact, in the five years up to 2020, Everton’s £350m owner funding was the highest in the Premier League, but decision-making about both managers and players has often been poor.  Everton's revenue is the eighth highest in the top flight, it’s still far below the leading clubs, e.g. Manchester United’s £590m is three times as much, while Liverpool 2016/17 £364m was almost double.

What makes a club big?

Leaving aside the very top clubs, how can one decide whether a club is big?   Some clubs would accept the badge of ‘small’ as a mark of pride given their level of achievement.    That could apply to Burton Albion and Fleetwood Town in League One.  It looks as if Cheltenham Town and Forest Green Rovers will be able to play the famed ‘El Glosico’ in League One next season.    Neither club would claim to be big; indeed Forest Green has built its image around its ecological commitment.

I think that there are three criteria that could be used to help decide whether a club is ‘big’: attendance, ground capacity and league record.    Attendances fascinate fans, but the statistics are very unreliable.   In days gone by, before the creation of current levels of security, it was often possible to sneak into a ground without paying.    There were also allegations that clubs understated the attendance and revenue to reduce their entertainment tax liability.

Stadium size could be a criterion. Many clubs have invested in their stadiums in recent years, often to add additional corporate capacity in the top flight.   Some have moved to new sites, West Ham getting a particularly good deal on the London Stadium.  Everton’s hopes for revival are pinned on their new stadium.   Tottenham Hotspur probably have the most Impressive and flexible new stadium but such investments can load a club with considerable debt.   

Bournemouth have not expanded their stadium, because of difficulties with the ground owners, although when they were in the Premier League this meant they were more reliant that any other club on broadcasting revenue.   Too rapid a stadium expansion can lead to empty spaces and a lack of atmosphere when relegation occurs.

How long a club has spent in the top flight may be seen as a hallmark of a big club, although calculations are affected by whether or not one thinks that football started with the creation of the Premier League.   One might also factor in FA Cup success, although these days achievement in the Champions League is arguably more important.

Perhaps, at the end of the day, it's all a matter of opinions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl