Salford can live with big losses

The authoritative Swiss Ramble examines the accounts of Salford City. In the last three years Salford’s had £10.2m negative operating cash flow, having adjusted for non-cash items. They then spent £0.7m on players (purchases £0.9m, sales £0.2m), £1.6m on infrastructure (new stadium) and paid £0.4m interest. This was funded by £12.7m loans from the owners.

Since the Class of ’92 arrived, Salford have lost £15.1m in 7 years, including £14.2m in the last 4 years alone. As the club has progressed up the leagues, the losses have grown, though Gary Neville explained, “It is a lot of money to lose, but we’ve come up from step eight.”

Salford’s £3.2m revenue was below quite a few of their rivals in League Two. Six of the clubs that published details had revenue above £4m, namely Bolton £6.2m, Forest Green Rovers £5.8m, Tranmere Rovers £4.9m, Bradford City £4.5m, Leyton Orient £4.3m and Walsall £4.2m. Salford’s revenue has nearly tripled from £1.2m in 2018 to £3.2m in 2021, which is pretty good going, especially as “the global pandemic caused a significant loss in revenue opportunities”.

Salford have made the highest losses in each of the last four seasons: £4.8m in 2020/21 (League Two), £3.8m in 2019/20 (League Two), £3.6m in 2018/19 (National League) and £2.0m in 2017/18 (National League North).

Gary Neville: “The money that we put in is manageable between the seven of us. We're comfortable with our position. There's no financial pressure (to get promoted), but there is sporting disappointment.”

On the other hand, Salford’s big spending has given them a clear advantage over their rivals. Accrington Stanley owner provided the counter argument “All they do is raise the bar for the rest. Their largess damages those clubs that are trying to operate sustainably.”

Salford’s £15.6m gross debt was the second highest in League Two, though a long way below Colchester United’s £29.2m. That said, it was more than three times as much as the next highest club, Mansfield Town £4.5m.

Salford spent £156k on player purchases in 2020/21, only below Port Vale £180k and Bolton Wanderers £179k. This actually represented a reduction on the prior year’s £281k gross spend, which was second highest in League Two, only surpassed by Mansfield £294k.

Wages

Salford’s wages to turnover ratio increased from 121% to 143%, which was by far the highest (worst) in League Two, ahead of Bolton Wanderers 112%, Leyton Orient 111% and Scunthorpe United 106%. That said, it was better than the 164% in the National League two years ago.

Not all League Two clubs disclose wages in their accounts, but Salford’s £4.5m was third highest of those that do, only surpassed by Bolton Wanderers £6.9m and Leyton Orient £4.8m. Despite the revenue reduction, Salford’s wages rose £0.4m (10%) from £4.1m to £4.5m, which means that wages have increased by nearly 70% since promotion to League Two (up from £2.7m in 2018).

Salford’s commercial revenue (including broadcasting income) has nearly tripled in the last two years from £1.1m in 2018 to £3.0m in 2021. Their shirt sponsorship is with TalkTalk until 2023/24,while Castore replaced Kappa as kit supplier from 2022/23.

Salford’s average attendance steadily rose from 117 in the NPL Division One North in 2013 to 3,022 in 2020 (pre-pandemic), though it fell nearly 30% to 2,152 in 2022, the lowest in League Two. The club’s potential was shown by the record 4,518 crowd for an EFL Cup tie in 2019.

Salford encapsulate some of the governance challenges in football. On the one hand, the club should be applauded for its amazing climb up the leagues. As Gary Neville explained, “We’re trying to build a fanbase in a city that’s not had a Football League club ever.”

After Simon Jordan questioned whether Salford had complied with financial fair play rules, Neville emphasised that the owners put cash in upfront, in line with the League Two Salary Cost Management Protocol (SCMP) guidelines. These state that player-related expenditure should be no more than 50% of revenue plus 100% of the “football fortune”, which includes transfer income, donations and cash/equity injections.

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog