Salford can live with big losses

The authoritative Swiss Ramble examines the accounts of Salford City. In the last three years Salford’s had £10.2m negative operating cash flow, having adjusted for non-cash items. They then spent £0.7m on players (purchases £0.9m, sales £0.2m), £1.6m on infrastructure (new stadium) and paid £0.4m interest. This was funded by £12.7m loans from the owners.

Since the Class of ’92 arrived, Salford have lost £15.1m in 7 years, including £14.2m in the last 4 years alone. As the club has progressed up the leagues, the losses have grown, though Gary Neville explained, “It is a lot of money to lose, but we’ve come up from step eight.”

Salford’s £3.2m revenue was below quite a few of their rivals in League Two. Six of the clubs that published details had revenue above £4m, namely Bolton £6.2m, Forest Green Rovers £5.8m, Tranmere Rovers £4.9m, Bradford City £4.5m, Leyton Orient £4.3m and Walsall £4.2m. Salford’s revenue has nearly tripled from £1.2m in 2018 to £3.2m in 2021, which is pretty good going, especially as “the global pandemic caused a significant loss in revenue opportunities”.

Salford have made the highest losses in each of the last four seasons: £4.8m in 2020/21 (League Two), £3.8m in 2019/20 (League Two), £3.6m in 2018/19 (National League) and £2.0m in 2017/18 (National League North).

Gary Neville: “The money that we put in is manageable between the seven of us. We're comfortable with our position. There's no financial pressure (to get promoted), but there is sporting disappointment.”

On the other hand, Salford’s big spending has given them a clear advantage over their rivals. Accrington Stanley owner provided the counter argument “All they do is raise the bar for the rest. Their largess damages those clubs that are trying to operate sustainably.”

Salford’s £15.6m gross debt was the second highest in League Two, though a long way below Colchester United’s £29.2m. That said, it was more than three times as much as the next highest club, Mansfield Town £4.5m.

Salford spent £156k on player purchases in 2020/21, only below Port Vale £180k and Bolton Wanderers £179k. This actually represented a reduction on the prior year’s £281k gross spend, which was second highest in League Two, only surpassed by Mansfield £294k.

Wages

Salford’s wages to turnover ratio increased from 121% to 143%, which was by far the highest (worst) in League Two, ahead of Bolton Wanderers 112%, Leyton Orient 111% and Scunthorpe United 106%. That said, it was better than the 164% in the National League two years ago.

Not all League Two clubs disclose wages in their accounts, but Salford’s £4.5m was third highest of those that do, only surpassed by Bolton Wanderers £6.9m and Leyton Orient £4.8m. Despite the revenue reduction, Salford’s wages rose £0.4m (10%) from £4.1m to £4.5m, which means that wages have increased by nearly 70% since promotion to League Two (up from £2.7m in 2018).

Salford’s commercial revenue (including broadcasting income) has nearly tripled in the last two years from £1.1m in 2018 to £3.0m in 2021. Their shirt sponsorship is with TalkTalk until 2023/24,while Castore replaced Kappa as kit supplier from 2022/23.

Salford’s average attendance steadily rose from 117 in the NPL Division One North in 2013 to 3,022 in 2020 (pre-pandemic), though it fell nearly 30% to 2,152 in 2022, the lowest in League Two. The club’s potential was shown by the record 4,518 crowd for an EFL Cup tie in 2019.

Salford encapsulate some of the governance challenges in football. On the one hand, the club should be applauded for its amazing climb up the leagues. As Gary Neville explained, “We’re trying to build a fanbase in a city that’s not had a Football League club ever.”

After Simon Jordan questioned whether Salford had complied with financial fair play rules, Neville emphasised that the owners put cash in upfront, in line with the League Two Salary Cost Management Protocol (SCMP) guidelines. These state that player-related expenditure should be no more than 50% of revenue plus 100% of the “football fortune”, which includes transfer income, donations and cash/equity injections.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion. Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs. An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog