Skip to main content

Where the big six spend their money

The authoritative Swiss Ramble looks at where the money goes by analysing the last five years for the Big Six Premier League clubs.

Manchester United generated most revenue in the last five years with £2.8 bln, ahead ofManchester City £2.6 bn, and around £900m more than Tottenham Hotspur and Arsenal. United led the way in both match day and commercial income, but were behind Man City and Liverpool in broadcasting revenue.

Two of the Big Six received owner funding in the form of share capital injections: Manchester City £81m and Chelsea £50m. This is the best form of owner financing for the club, as it does not need to be repaid.

Four of the Big Six spent between £1.4 bn and £1.5 bn on wages in the last five years. Manchester City led the way with £1,545m, just ahead of United £1,498m, followed by Liverpool £1,422m and Chelsea £1,366m. There is then a big gap to Arsenal £1,117m and particularly Spurs £839m.

Three of the Big Six account for two-thirds of player purchases in last five years, namely Man City £978m, Chelsea £924m and United £886m. There is then a fairly steep drop to Liverpool £637m, Arsenal £573m and Spurs £347m.

Tottenham Hotspur are responsible for over 70% of the Big Six capital expenditure in the last five years with £1.2 bn (very largely on their new stadium). The others’ outlay is considerably smaller, though both Man City and Liverpool spent around £130m on infrastructure improvements.

In the last five years Arsenal had the lowest revenue and just about lowest player sales of the Big Six. As a result their wages and player purchases lagged behind. They still had to use £239m of the cash reserve they had built up in better times.

Chelsea benefited the most from owner funding with £267m in the last 5 years (loans £217m and share capital £50m), but generated the most from player sales with £513m. They had the second highest player purchases with £924m.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/