Skip to main content

Big losses at Juve

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest accounts of Juventus.   The pre-tax loss widened from €208m to €252m (€254m after tax), as revenue dropped €35m (8%) from €450m to €415m and profit on player sales fell €3m (9%) to €28m. Operating expenses rose €1m (6%), while net interest payable increased €5m (49%) to €16m.

Unsurprisingly, Juventus huge €254m post-tax loss is the worst in Italy to date for 2021/22, much higher than Inter €140m and Milan €67m. Almost all Italian clubs have posted losses in the past 2 years, influenced by COVID. One exception is Atalanta who made €35m net profit.

In fact, the €254m post-tax loss is the highest ever in Italy, ahead of Inter €246m and their own €210m in 2020/21. Their total €289m deficit for 2020 and 2021 was one of the worst in Europe, only surpassed by Barcelona €689m, PSG €350m, Inter €337m and Everton €296m.

After four years of profits , Juventus have now made losses five seasons in a row, worsening each year and adding up to a €579m pre-tax deficit in that period. The club expects 2022/23 results to “significantly improve”, though not so much that they will manage to break-even.

Losses were largely, but not solely, caused by the impact of COVID, which Juventus estimated as a hefty €320m for 3-year period between 2020 and 2022, including losses in match day income and retail sales, plus lower money from player sales due to a deflated transfer market.

The importance of player trading to the Juventus business model is illustrated by them making €557m profit from player sales in the 5 years up to 2021, nearly €200m more than Napoli, and the best performance in Europe, comfortably ahead of Chelsea €471m and Real Madrid €411m.

Highest revenue in Italy

Excluding player sales, Juventus revenue fell €80m (16%) in the past three years from the €494m peak to €415m, though still club’s 3rd highest ever. Reduction has been driven by match day, down €38m due to COVID restrictions, and broadcasting, partly offset by commercial growth.

Despite the fall, Juventus €415m revenue is still highest in Italy, well ahead of Inter €354m, Milan €241m, Roma €197m and Napoli €179m (2020/21 figures). The only leading club that has greatly grown revenue is Atalanta, doubling from €85m in 2019 to €169m thanks to Champions League.

Importance of Champions League

It is imperative that Juventus do well in Champions League to boost broadcasting income, as Serie A TV rights are low at €1.1bln, especially after new deal fell 13% (domestic down 5%, international 37%). Agnelli described the Premier League €3.9bln deal as “unapproachable”.

The Swiss Ramble estimates that Juventus earned €76m from the Champions League after reaching the last 16, €7m less than prior year, mainly due to TV pool (smaller Italian deal, less favourable Serie A finish). Still better than other Italian clubs: Inter €63m, Milan €45m and Atalanta €39m.

Worth noting the influence on Champions League money of the UEFA coefficient payment (based on performances over 10 years), where Juventus had the 6th highest ranking, guaranteeing them €31m, compared to much lower amounts at Milan €17m, Inter €16m and Atalanta €5m.

The Champions League is extremely important for Juventus, earning them €419m in the last 5 year, significantly higher than other Italian clubs (Inter €225m, Roma €201m & Napoli €193m), though they peaked in 2017 with €110m. This season’s struggles are therefore meaningful.

Commercial income rose €5m (3%) to €200m, including more money from activities taking place at the stadium. Juve have almost doubled this revenue stream since 2016, distancing themselves from Inter, whose revenue from Chinese sponsors has fallen from its peak.

As a result, Juventus €200m commercial income is comfortably the highest in Italy, well ahead of Inter €142m, then a big gap to Milan €94m, Fiorentina €58m & Roma €53m. However, Juve miles below other too European clubs like Bayern €345m, PSG €337m and Real Madrid €322m.

The wage bill rose €29m (9%) from €323m to €352m, the highest ever in Serie A, despite Cristiano Ronaldo’s move to Man United. The only other Italian club with similar growth in the past 5 years is Inter, but others have hardly increased at all, e.g. Milan and Roma.

Wages

The wage bill of €352m is significantly higher than the rest of Serie A with closest challengers being Inter €262m, Milan €170m, Roma €169m & Napoli €155m. However, a fair bit less than European peers, e.g. PSG €503m, Barcelona €432m and Man City €401m (all from 2021).

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 72% to 85%, the club’s highest since 2011 and well above UEFA’s recommended 70% limit. This is mid-table in Italy, around the same as Napoli and Roma, but a fair bit higher than Inter 74% and Milan 70% (though these are from 2021).

Based on Transfermarkt, #uventus have by far the highest gross transfer spend in Serie A in last five years (up to 2022/23) of €880m, around €400m more than Inter €495m, Roma €489m, Milan €478m and Napoli €443m. On a net spend basis, Juve €282m is just ahead of Milan €261m.

Gross debt of €223m is now 3rd highest in Italy, below both Inter €472m & Roma €335m. Loans were originally for stadium development, but have increasingly been used to finance investment in squad. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/