Skip to main content

Why Ajax have to be a selling club

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the 2020/21 accounts of Ajax.  Their pre-tax loss widened from €12m to €32m (€24m after tax), despite revenue rising €64m (51%) from €125m to €189m, as profit from player sales fell €48m from €86m to €38m and operating expenses increased €35m (16%).

The €32m pre-tax loss is the highest in the Netherlands, even though the most recent accounts for other clubs cover the 2020/21 season, which included a full year of COVID. In 2019/20 (pre-pandemic) no fewer than 11 of the 18 Eredivisie clubs were profitable.

Ajax normally run a sustainable business model, but they have posted losses amounting to €43m in the past two years, driven by the pandemic. In the previous eight years, they had accumulated nearly a quarter of a billion Euros profit, averaging €30m a season.

In fairness, Ajax have done much better than other leading European clubs during the pandemic, reporting an aggregate pre-tax €15m profit for 2019/20 and 2020/21, which was significantly better than the huge losses at the likes of Barcelona €689m, PSG €350m and Inter €337m.

However, Ajax are very reliant on player sales, earning nearly half a billion (€485m) from this activity in the last decade, including €281m in the last four years. This season’s figures will be even more impressive after sales of Antony, Martinez, Haller, Schuurs and Tagliafico.  They  are known for their strategy of developing and selling players, as highlighted by the €361m profit made in the 5 years up to 2021, more than three times as much as PSV €110m. In fact, they have one of the highest gains from player trading in all of Europe.

Revenue

Main reason for Ajax revenue increase was match day, which rose €32m from €2m to €34m, due to the partial return of fans to the stadium, while broadcasting was up €19m (34%) from €55m to €74m and commercial grew €13m (19%) from €68m to €81m.

Following last year’s growth, Ajax €189m revenue is only €10m (5%) less than the club’s €199m peak in 2019, when they reached the Champions League semi-finals. Lower match day (due to COVID restrictions) and broadcasting have been largely offset by higher commercial.

€189m revenue is by far the highest in Netherlands, well ahead of PSV €71m and Feyenoord €62m, though their rivals’ figures are from the 2020/21 season when games were played without fans and 13 of the 18 Eredivisie clubs had revenue lower than €15m.

In 2021 Ajax dropped out of the Deloitte Money League with their €125m revenue being a long way below 30th placed Lazio €164m, having been as high as 23rd in 2019. This highlights that their revenue is far below the European elite, which is why Ajax are a selling club.

The importance of Europe

Ajax earned €63m from Europe in 2021/22 after reaching Champions League last 16. This was €17m more than prior year’s €46m when they were eliminated in the Champions League group stage, followed by making the Europa League quarter-finals.  A large part of Ajax European money comes from the UEFA coefficient payment (based on performances over 10 years), where they were ranked 15th in the Champions League, thus receiving €20m. This distribution methodology rewards the club’s good record in Europe.   They have earned a hefty €237m from European competition in the last five years, which is even more impressive considering that they did not reach the group stage of the Champions League or the Europa League in 2018.

The importance of Champions League qualification to the Ajax business model cannot be over-stated with their €237m European TV money in last five years being considerably more than PSV €62m and Feyenoord €52m and much higher than the domestic TV deal.

The wage bill rose €14m (15%) from €95m to €109m, due to higher bonuses, player signings and contract extensions.  This was far more than Dutch rivals, e.g. in 2020/21 PSV €47m and Feyenoord €37m, and actually the highest ever in the Eredivisie. Following the increase in revenue, Ajax wages to turnover ratio improved from 76% to 58%, which was one of the lowest (best) in the Eredivisie, However, for Ajax it is a case of being “a big fish in a small pond”, as their €95m wage bill in 2020/21 was significantly lower than top clubs in the major leagues, e.g. less than 20% of PSG €503m. This makes it fairly inevitable that their young stars will move abroad.

They are a well-run club, but their business model is very reliant on two factors: (a) qualification for the Champions League; (b) profitable player sales. They clearly have the best financial resources in the Eredivisie, but are still far behind their elite European rivals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/