Skip to main content

Generous funding at Stoke but more limited success on the pitch

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the 2021/22 accounts of Stoke City: https://swissramble.substack.com/p/stoke-city-finances-202122

Stoke swung from a £10m pre-tax loss to a £102m profit, though this was driven by the owners of the club forgiving £120m of historic debts that had been accumulated in support of investment into the club.

Following four consecutive years of losses, this is the first time that Stoke have reported a profit since 2017. As a rule, they managed to make (small) profits when in the Premier league.

Stoke’s profit from player sales increased from just £0.9m to £10.9m, mainly from Nathan Collins to Burnley and Sam Surridge to Nottingham Forest.  This is actually the highest in 2021/22 for those clubs that have so far published accounts, as the impact of COVID has resulted in a depressed transfer market, especially at the Championship level. 

Since relegation from the Premier League, Stoke’s revenue has dropped by £96m (75%) from £127m in 2018 to £31m, almost entirely due to less TV money in the Championship (£92m decrease), though gate receipts and commercial are also down by £2m apiece.  Stoke’s revenue has now fallen five years in a row from a peak of £136m in 2017, mainly as a result of relegation and declining parachute payments.

Even after the decrease, Stoke’s £31m revenue is one of the highest in the Championship, only behind those clubs in receipt of parachute payments. For example, in 2020/21 three such clubs were well above £50m, namely Bournemouth £72m, Norwich City £57m and Watford £57m.

Stoke’s wage bill fell £13m (25%) from £50m to £37m, despite headcount increasing from 317 to 336, as the club had to compensate for parachute payments stopping. This means that wages are down 60% (from £94m) in the four years since relegation.  This is the club’s lowest wage bill since £30m in 2010, but it should fall even further after the departure of some relatively high earners last summer. Despite the decrease, Stoke’s £37m wage bill is still one of the highest in the Championship. In fact, it is the highest reported to date in 2021/22, though they will certainly be overtaken when the three clubs most recently relegated publish their accounts.

The Swiss Ramble reckons that the Coates family have pumped £338m into Stoke City since regaining control of the club in 2006, comprising loans £251m, share capital £2m and £86m payment for the sale of the stadium and training ground.   Excluding the property sale proceeds, the Coates family have put in £195m of funding in the 10 years up to 2021. That’s a lot of money, which is actually only surpassed in the Championship by QPR’s £283m.

Stoke’s owners can be praised for their magnificent financial support, but the other side of the coin is sporting success, and mistakes have clearly been made in that department.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl