Skip to main content

Generous funding at Stoke but more limited success on the pitch

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the 2021/22 accounts of Stoke City: https://swissramble.substack.com/p/stoke-city-finances-202122

Stoke swung from a £10m pre-tax loss to a £102m profit, though this was driven by the owners of the club forgiving £120m of historic debts that had been accumulated in support of investment into the club.

Following four consecutive years of losses, this is the first time that Stoke have reported a profit since 2017. As a rule, they managed to make (small) profits when in the Premier league.

Stoke’s profit from player sales increased from just £0.9m to £10.9m, mainly from Nathan Collins to Burnley and Sam Surridge to Nottingham Forest.  This is actually the highest in 2021/22 for those clubs that have so far published accounts, as the impact of COVID has resulted in a depressed transfer market, especially at the Championship level. 

Since relegation from the Premier League, Stoke’s revenue has dropped by £96m (75%) from £127m in 2018 to £31m, almost entirely due to less TV money in the Championship (£92m decrease), though gate receipts and commercial are also down by £2m apiece.  Stoke’s revenue has now fallen five years in a row from a peak of £136m in 2017, mainly as a result of relegation and declining parachute payments.

Even after the decrease, Stoke’s £31m revenue is one of the highest in the Championship, only behind those clubs in receipt of parachute payments. For example, in 2020/21 three such clubs were well above £50m, namely Bournemouth £72m, Norwich City £57m and Watford £57m.

Stoke’s wage bill fell £13m (25%) from £50m to £37m, despite headcount increasing from 317 to 336, as the club had to compensate for parachute payments stopping. This means that wages are down 60% (from £94m) in the four years since relegation.  This is the club’s lowest wage bill since £30m in 2010, but it should fall even further after the departure of some relatively high earners last summer. Despite the decrease, Stoke’s £37m wage bill is still one of the highest in the Championship. In fact, it is the highest reported to date in 2021/22, though they will certainly be overtaken when the three clubs most recently relegated publish their accounts.

The Swiss Ramble reckons that the Coates family have pumped £338m into Stoke City since regaining control of the club in 2006, comprising loans £251m, share capital £2m and £86m payment for the sale of the stadium and training ground.   Excluding the property sale proceeds, the Coates family have put in £195m of funding in the 10 years up to 2021. That’s a lot of money, which is actually only surpassed in the Championship by QPR’s £283m.

Stoke’s owners can be praised for their magnificent financial support, but the other side of the coin is sporting success, and mistakes have clearly been made in that department.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...