Brighton swung from a £53m pre-tax loss to £24m profit, a
significant £77m improvement, mainly due to profit from player sales shooting
up from £7m to £62m, though revenue also rose £28m (20%) from £146m to a club
record £174m.
Brighton’s £24m profit is the second best financial
performance to date in the Premier League, only surpassed by Manchester City’s
£42m. This is indeed impressive, especially as some clubs reported substantial
losses last season, including Manchester United £150m, Leicester City £92m and
Tottenham £61m.
This is only the second time that Brighton have posted a
profit in the last decade, with the £24m surplus comfortably beating the
previous record of £12m in the first season following promotion to the top flight. Despite last season’s profit, Brighton’s
total losses since promotion still add up to £106m.
Brighton spent £70m on player purchases in 2021/22, which
was more than twice as much as the previous season’s £31m, and the second
highest in the club’s history. It was also just ahead of Liverpool’s £69m
outlay, but significantly lower than the likes of Aston Villa £204m, Arsenal
£188m and Tottenham £160m.
Brighton’s transfer expenditure has significantly increased
since promotion to the Premier League, as they have spent £292m in the last
five years, compared to only £37m in the preceding 5-year period.
Brighton’s gross financial debt increased by £35m from £374m
to £409m,almost entirely from owner Tony Bloom in the shape of an
interest-free, unsecured loan of £406m. Brighton’s debt is undoubtedly very high for a club of their
size, though it is not an issue, so long as Bloom continues to provide support.
The fact that his loan is interest-free gives Albion a competitive advantage
against those rivals that have to pay interest on their loans. Bloom has now provided just shy of half a
billion pounds to Brighton via £406m of loans and £88m of share capital
(including £30m loans converted into equity).
This is obviously a very good set of financial results with Brighton setting club records for revenue, player sales and profit, but it should be acknowledged that they still required another £70m from their owner.
Comments
Post a Comment