Skip to main content

Options for United's sale

It’s been almost six months since the Glazers said they would explore a sale of Manchester United, the football club owned by the Floridian family since 2005.

Two suitors have emerged so far: UK chemicals billionaire Jim Ratcliffe and Sheikh Jassim, the son of one of Qatar’s richest men. Ratcliffe submitted his second bid — putting a value on the club above £5bn — on Thursday evening.

But supporters are still worried that the Glazers won’t sell up in full, and are instead planning to extend a stay that has been protested from day one. Many are still angry at the amount of debt put on the club to fund the original takeover, as well as fading fortunes on the pitch.

If the Glazers want to remain in charge, they will have plenty of options. A number of US investment firms, including Elliott Management, are keeping a watchful eye on the process in case an opportunity arises.

The Glazer siblings could opt to sell a slice of the business, leaving some of them in control but bringing in new minority shareholders.

They could also seek some new financing, perhaps with a view to investing in the club’s infrastructure. Old Trafford, once the pinnacle of English football stadiums, and the Carrington training ground both need money spent on them. But that sort of funding won’t come cheap, and the club already has sizeable debts.

Another option could be to copy what Real Madrid and Barcelona have done — take in money tied to a particular revenue stream, such as commercial or media rights. Barcelona sold off a chunk of its future TV revenue, generating more than €500mn in cash. Real Madrid received €360mn in return for rights to stage non-football events at its revamped stadium. In both cases, this came from Sixth Street, another US investor keeping close tabs on the Man Utd process.

People close to one of the bidders warned this week that the Glazers might be stringing everyone along to augment their negotiating power as they explore other options that would leave them at the helm of one of the world’s most famous sports teams.

On the other hand, one private investment firm speculated that they were being used to squeeze every penny from Ratcliffe and Sheikh Jassim. Paranoia is everywhere.

United’s New York-listed shares have roughly doubled since the club was put on the block. But there have been a few bumps along the way, and the current enterprise value of roughly $5bn (£4.1bn) remains some way short of Ratcliffe’s latest offer. The market looks positioned for a deal, but has yet to be convinced.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/