Skip to main content

Everton's big losses

Everton’s pre-tax loss decreased by £76m (63%) from £121m to £45m, mainly due to profit from player sales rising £55m from £13m to £68m.  Although Everton’s £45m loss is obviously not great, this is by no means the worst financial result in the Premier League in 2021/22 with some clubs reporting much higher losses, including Manchester United £150m, Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

After many years following a frugal approach, Everton have really pushed the boat out under Moshiri, losing a colossal £417m over the last four years. The club has not posted a profit since 2017/18. The only crumb of comfort is that the loss has now reduced two years in a row. In this period, Everton have reported three of the 10 highest losses ever in England.  In fact, no Premier League club has lost more than Everton in the last four years.

Everton’s £181m revenue has fallen to 10th highest in the Premier League, having been overtaken by West Ham £253m, Leicester City £215m and Leeds United £189m.  They are miles below the Big Six, less than half of the sixth highest club, Arsenal £369m.

Everton’s revenue growth since 2018 is the worst of their closest rivals, which helps explain their deteriorating performance. In the last four years, their revenue has actually dropped £8m, while most other clubs have seen decent growth.

Everton’s wages to turnover ratio decreased (improved) from 95% to 90%, though this is still the club’s second highest ever. This important ratio has significantly worsened from 61% in 2017 and is well above UEFA’s recommended upper limit of 70%.

In the last six years Everton’s money has largely come from Moshiri £678m with a further £116m from bank loans. The majority of this has been spent on the squad £381m with another £266m on infrastructure investment. In addition, £81m was used to cover operating losses with another £31m on interest payments.

nobody in the Premier League has provided more funding than Everton’s owner in the five years up to 2021 (the last season when all clubs have published their accounts). Since then, Moshiri has injected another £300m.

The Premier League has recently referred Everton to an independent commission over an alleged breach of FFP relating to the 2021-22 season, though the club said that it was “extremely confident” of remaining compliant with the Profitability and Sustainability rules.

On the face of it, things don’t look too good for Everton, as they have averaged pre-tax losses above £100m over the last four years, adding up to a horrific £417m, though there are some important differences between reported losses and the FFP calculation.

While it is true that Everton have faced a perfect storm of COVID and expensive stadium development in recent times, their investment in the squad and management has left an awful lot to be desired, leading to huge player write-offs and high turnover in coaching staff.

The financial losses are shocking and have only been covered by massive funding from the owner, though this has left the club facing a major challenge to meet FFP regulations, which has led to restrictions on spending - with the effects clearly seen in the league table.

Most damningly, the significant investment is yet to deliver success on the pitch. Far from it, in fact, as the threat of relegation currently hangs over the club.

Everton’s auditors have warned about the possible impact of relegation on the club.

They stated: “Should the club be relegated, it will require additional financial support from its majority shareholder, who themselves are reliant on support from their majority shareholder, who have indicated they are supportive of the group but the support is not legally or contractually binding.

These matters indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt over the group’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/