Skip to main content

United now loss making

Manchester United’s pre-tax loss for the first half increased from £22m to £25m, so there was little overall movement.  Although Manchester United’s revenue was basically flat, this disguised two large offsetting movements. Commercial shot up £37m (29%) from £129m to £166m, but broadcasting dropped £36m (28%) from £130m to £94m.

The impact of interest payable on Manchester United’s accounts continues to be evident, rising from £17m to £19m. This is the highest amount charged in the first half in the last five years.  The significant swings arise largely because the majority of the club’s debt is denominated in USD and unhedged, so the significant weakening in the Pound against the Dollar has led to higher interest charges in the club’s accounts,.

The increasing financial challenges faced by United are clearly illustrated by the deterioration in profitability in the last two seasons. They posted healthy profits in the previous eight years, but the club now seems to be loss-making.

United’s £384m in wages in 2021/22 was comfortably the highest in the top flight. In fact, this was the highest ever in the Premier League, despite the club only finishing 6th and missing out on the Champions League.

United have made around £60m payouts to former managers in recent years, so this season’s bottom line will benefit from no repeat.

Manchester United spent £221m on bringing players to the club this season, which was their second highest outlay ever, only surpassed by £243m in 2017/18.   In fact, United have splashed out an incredible £1.7bln in the last 10 years, so they have clearly spent money, but maybe not as well as their fans would have liked.

Even after all the various refinancings, United’s £742m gross debt is significantly higher than the £604m owed after the Glazers’ leveraged buyout 17 years ago (although there has been substamtial inflation since then so the real figures are different). In fact, this is the club’s second highest ever financial debt, only below £773m in 2010.

In the period since the Glazers’ arrival up to 2021, Manchester United’s £725m interest payment was nearly three times as much as the next highest club, namely Arsenal with £251m.  Looked at another way, it was very nearly as much as the rest of the Premier League combined, which added up to £749m.

in the period since the Glazers’ arrival up to 2021, Manchester United’s £725m interest payment was nearly three times as much as the next highest club, namely Arsenal with £251m.  Looked at another way, it was very nearly as much as the rest of the Premier League combined, which added up to £749m.

Potential investors into United will presumably believe that they can do much better than the current owners, but it’s still difficult to justify the Glazers’ reported £6 bn asking price.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/