Skip to main content

Championship finalists punch well above their weight

Here is a financial comparison of the two clubs competing in the 2022/23 EFL Championship play-off final, Coventry City and Luton Town.    On paper, the two clubs are pretty evenly matched. Coventry’s £18.1m revenue is slightly higher than Luton’s £17.7m, while their squad cost is £7.4m compared to Luton’s £5.5m. On the other hand, Luton’s £17.8m wage bill is higher than Coventry’s £15.7m.

However, what is abundantly clear is that both finalists are punching well above their weight, considering the financial power of many of their Championship rivals.    In terms of revenue, both Coventry and Luton are towards the lower end of the table, well below the Championship average of £27m.

Luton’s £2.3m commercial income is one of the lowest in the Championship, less than half of Coventry’s £5.0m. However, both clubs are far below the top clubs, led by Stoke City £16.6m, followed by Bristol City £15.8m and Fulham £14.0m.

The real differentiator in the Championship is broadcasting income, due to the parachute payments awarded to clubs relegated from the Premier League, which are worth an estimated £44m in year one, £36m in year two and £16m in year three. As a result, Fulham, Sheffield United and WBA all enjoyed revenue of around £51m in 2021/22.

Other Championship clubs generally receive between £8m and £10m broadcasting income, mainly the EFL distribution £3.6m and Premier League solidarity payment £4.8m.

Luton £10.5m earned more than Coventry £8.8m, partly due to more televised games, including last season’s play-off semi-final.

Only three clubs in the Championship have reported lower wages to date than the play-off finalists, namely Blackpool, Hull City and Barnsley. Luton’s £17.8m wage bill is 14% higher than Coventry’s £15.7m, but there’s really not that much in it.

Neither Coventry or Luton have spent much in the transfer market in the last few years, so the cost of their squads is very low at £7.4m and £5.5m respectively. This is in stark contrast to clubs that were recently competing in the top flight, who often manage to retain a decent squad in the Championship, even after some player departures.

Given their financial disadvantages, both Coventry and Luton have massively over-achieved simply by getting to the Championship play-off final.

The winners of the game will see a dramatic increase in their revenue in the Premier League, which surely few will begrudge, given the trials and tribulations that they have suffered in recent years.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Lau on the ropes

Financial challenges are building up for Guichan Lau whose company WBA Holdings owns 66 per cent of West Bromwich Albion.   His company's accounts show that it is in default on a £2 million from a West Midlands heating company called Warmfront Holdings. Warmfront has agreed to take no action to reclaim the loan and interest until February next year.  Given a punitive rate of interest of 5 per cent a month, the amount outstanding will then be around £4 million. Lai has missed three deadlines to repay a loan from the Baggies to his Hong Kong company Wisdom Smart Corporation.  [sic]  Meanwhile the club have a £20m loan from MSD UK holdings at an annual interest rate of 13.8 per cent.