Skip to main content

Qataris make last ditch bid for United

The Qatari Sheikh looking to buy Manchester United has submitted a last-ditch offer to seize control of the Premier League club.

While bidders were invited to submit their final offers to the New York bankers overseeing the sale last month, The Times understands that Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad al-Thani made an improved, final offer on Tuesday in an attempt to see off his main rival, British petrochemicals billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe.

By the end of last week Ratcliffe and his team at Ineos had emerged as strong favourites to buy the club from the Glazers, with a deal that valued United higher than the Qataris while offering Joel and Avram Glazer the opportunity to retain about a 20 per cent stake.

Even now, the new Qatari offer falls short of Ratcliffe’s valuation, which could end up close to £6 billion if he then completes the full purchase of the club in the next two to four years.

But Sheikh Jassim is offering to buy 100 per cent of the club now, albeit for a price nearer to £5 billion. Insiders insist the Qatari offer represents a significant increase on their opening bid.

Conscious that they had not offered enough in the third and concluding round of bidding last month, the Qataris are clearly now hoping they can regain the initiative with what was being described as the final offer.

Ultimately, it now comes down to two of the six Glazer siblings — presently the club’s executive co-chairmen — to decide if they want to retain a stake at Old Trafford.

Initially, Ratcliffe and Ineos had indicated a desire to purchase the 69 per cent share held by the Glazer family. But it became increasingly apparent that Joel and Avram were more reluctant to sell than their siblings. Ratcliffe came up with an alternative offer that enabled them to remain involved though the petrochemicals billionaire and his associates will have control once a takeover has been completed.

The deal is complicated by the split between B-shares, which carry powerful voting rights, and the A-shares on the New York Stock Exchange, and it is likely that more talks will be needed to thrash out the exact terms of the deal which could take a number of weeks.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Lau on the ropes

Financial challenges are building up for Guichan Lau whose company WBA Holdings owns 66 per cent of West Bromwich Albion.   His company's accounts show that it is in default on a £2 million from a West Midlands heating company called Warmfront Holdings. Warmfront has agreed to take no action to reclaim the loan and interest until February next year.  Given a punitive rate of interest of 5 per cent a month, the amount outstanding will then be around £4 million. Lai has missed three deadlines to repay a loan from the Baggies to his Hong Kong company Wisdom Smart Corporation.  [sic]  Meanwhile the club have a £20m loan from MSD UK holdings at an annual interest rate of 13.8 per cent.