Skip to main content

A major reset at Chelsea

Chelsea FC’s US owners believe a major reset will prevent a repeat of a calamitous first year in charge during which the club spent record amounts on players but suffered its worst season in almost three decades.  Speaking to the Financial Times, Chelsea chair Todd Boehly said: “We feel really good about the sporting side of the house. Morale is high and the culture is good. On the commercial side, we’ve got a lot of new hires. We’re excited about the path ahead.”

A consortium led by Boehly, co-owner of the LA Dodgers baseball team, and Clearlake Capital acquired the club for a record sum of £2.5bn in a forced sale last year from sanctions-hit Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich. The combination of a private equity firm and a financier with a proven record in the sector was expected to bring financial rigour and sporting savvy following the excesses of the Abramovich era, in which Chelsea lost almost £1mn a week over close to 20 years.

The high price raised valuation expectations across football, prompting the US owners of rivals Manchester United and Liverpool to explore sales. But Chelsea’s first season under new ownership proved disastrous and raised questions about whether the flood of professional investors coming into football have a path to making money. The team finished the season in 12th place, its worst league position since 1994, while the result deprived the club of qualification for European football for the first time since 2016.

Participation in the Uefa Champions League generated an average of £87mn a year for the club during the past three seasons.  Todd Boehly: ‘The culture is good . . . we’re excited about the path ahead’.   “It was one of those seasons that was just chaotic on and off the pitch from start to finish”, said Dan Silver, a board member of the Chelsea Supporters Trust, who added that some of the problems had been building up long before the takeover. “We were poor. We were underprepared.” 

However, the US owners hope to get on the front foot with a number of key additions to both the sporting and commercial operations, while talks have begun with several outside investors, including Ares Management, over raising new funds. Fresh capital could be used to bolster the club’s finances ahead of a possible stadium redevelopment and a further push into multi-club ownership following the recent purchase of French team RC Strasbourg.

Chelsea made a pre-tax loss of £121mn on revenues of £481mn in the year ended June 2022. Among the arrivals is new chief executive Chris Jurasek, a veteran from other companies backed by Clearlake, Chelsea’s biggest shareholder. An experienced hand in the technology sector, Jurasek will take on some of the responsibilities that had fallen to Tom Glick, Chelsea’s president of business, who is currently serving his notice period after less than a year with the club. More executive hires are planned as the owners look to beef up what they see as underpowered commercial operations.

Jurasek’s priorities include sealing a deal for a new front-of-shirt sponsor to replace UK mobile phone operator Three, which chose not to renew its £40mn-a-year partnership when it ended this summer.  The club had a deal with US streaming service Paramount+ that was nixed by the Premier League owing to a perceived conflict with the competition’s broadcast partners, according to several people familiar with the matter.  A tentative agreement with a betting company was then ditched after pushback from fans. A number of potential partners remain in talks.

One cloud hanging over the club was lifted late last month when it reached a €10mn settlement with Uefa related to potential breaches of its financial reporting rules. The issues, which are also being examined by the Premier League, occurred during Abramovich’s tenure, and were quickly flagged to the authorities by the new owners.

The club has been a net seller overall this summer, with €254mn-worth of players heading for the exit — more than any other club. Sales include Kai Havertz to Arsenal for £65mn and Mason Mount to Manchester United for £55mn, while several players have been swept up in the spending spree by clubs in Saudi Arabia.  Aside from the fees generated, the departures already agreed should net the club annual savings of about £50mn from reduced player amortisation and up to £80mn from lower wages, according to estimates from Football Benchmark, a consultancy. Most of the incoming players are much younger, on longer contracts and on lower salaries than those leaving.

Comments

  1. Chelsea presently presents a team difficult to analyse, you just don't know what to expect from them including the management of the club and I believe this is one of the reason why Liverpool failed to Chelsea over Caicedo deal.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/