Skip to main content

The big six compared

Whether the concept of the 'Big Six' in the Premier League is quite what it was with the financial boost at Newcastle is an open question, but anyway here are some comparisons over the last five years from the Swiss Ramble.

Manchester in the lead

The Big Six Premier League clubs had a total of £18.2 bn of available funds in the last five years. Manchester City led the way with £3.4 bln, closely followed by Manchester United £3.3 bln. There were three other clubs around the £3 bln level, but there was then a big gap to Arsenal, who lagged the others with “only” £2.5 bn.

Manchester United generated the most revenue in the last five years with £2.8 bn. They were just ahead of Manchester City £2.7 bn, even though they were overtaken by their rivals in the last two seasons.

Four clubs increased their revenue by more than £100m in the last five years with the largest growth at Liverpool, whose income rose £230m (nearly two-thirds) from £364m to £594m. Manchester United’s revenue was basically flat, while Arsenal’s fell £54m (13%) from £423m to £369m.

Manchester United generated the highest match day income of £428m, a fair way ahead of Arsenal £357m and Tottenham £355m. Manchester City’s £208m gate receipts were less than half of their local rivals.

Tottenham’s new stadium has allowed them to close the gap to Manchester United to just £4m in 2021/22, having been £69m ten years ago.

Spurs likely to top revenue chart

The chances are that Spurs match day revenue will be the highest in the Premier League when 2022/23 accounts are published, as they were playing in the Champions League, where they will receive much higher gate receipts, compared to the previous year’s sparsely attended Europe Conference matches.

The importance of the Champions League to English clubs’ business model is underlined by Arsenal’s relatively low £812m broadcasting revenue, as the Gunners did not qualify for UEFA’s leading tournament once in this period.

As a result, their income fell £53m (27%) from £199m to £146m. Furthermore, their £44m advantage over Liverpool in 2016/17 turned into a £115m deficit in 2021/22, a swing of £159m.

Manchester United had the highest commercial revenue of £1.3 bln in the last five years, but this was only thanks to starting from a high base, as the annual income actually dropped £18m (6%) from £276m to £258m.

Manchester City were only £33m below United over the five years, but have leapfrogged them in the last two seasons. City were one of three clubs to enjoy commercial growth of around £100m, though Arsenal only increased by £20m.

Player sales

Two clubs in particular made a lot of money from player sales, namely Chelsea £541m and Manchester City £445m, followed by Liverpool £318m. In contrast, there were much lower amounts at Arsenal £249m, Tottenham £198m and Manchester United £195m.

Three clubs received owner funding in the form of share capital injections: Chelsea £211m, Tottenham £97m and Manchester City £81m. This is the best form of owner financing for a football club, as it will never need to be repaid.

Four of the Big Six spent between £1.5 bn and £1.6 bln on wages in the last five years. Manchester City led the way with £1,635m, very slightly ahead of Manchester United £1,619m, closely followed by Liverpool £1,580m and then Chelsea £1,486m.   There is then a sizeable gap to Arsenal £1,130m and particularly Tottenham £922m.

Net transfer spend (in cash terms) for the Big Six was £2.3 bn in the last five years (purchases £4.3 bln less £2.0 bln). The highest by some distance was Manchester United £612m, followed by Manchester City £497m and Chelsea £376m.   Arsenal’s activity in the transfer market has really ramped up recently, so much so that their £336m net spend was actually higher than Liverpool £318m. Tottenham were miles below the others at just £179m.

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/