Why Newcastle get less from the Champions League

Judging from the Newcastle fan interviewed on Radio 5 this morning the Toon Army enjoyed their night at the San Siro and were justifiably satisfied with their 0-0 draw. The financial rewards may not be as great.

Why will the Champions League not benefit Newcastle United as much as their rivals? The Geordies have basically been hammered for the crime of not playing in Europe for ages, so it does not really matter how good (or bad) the current team is, which means that Ashley’s legacy still lingers on.

Normally, the English clubs in the Champions League receive around four times as much as those playing in the Europe League, but Newcastle are the “Inbetweeners” this season. Their €30m revenue is stuck in the middle of the €60m average for the other three Champions League clubs and the €16m average for the Europa League.

Newcastle will receive a much lower TV pool than the other English clubs. Before a ball is kicked, their share will be €9.8m, which is only around half as much as Manchester City’s €18.3m.

To them that hath shall be given

The real damage to their earnings comes with the UEFA coefficient, where their €4.5m pales into insignificance compared to the other three English clubs: Manchester City €33.0m, Manchester United €28.4m and Arsenal €25.0m.

The UEFA coefficient payment was introduced in 2018/19, based on a team’s performance in UEFA tournaments over the past 10 years, including bonus points for winning tournaments.

This clearly benefits the established elite like Real Madrid, Bayern Munich and Barcelona, who all pick up well over €30m, having been rewarded in some cases by good performances many years ago.

Newcastle’s earnings are currently €30m, which is less than half of Manchester City’s €67m, and also miles below Manchester United €57m and Arsenal €56m.

That said, Newcastle will still do better financially than England’s representatives in the Europa League, where the current earnings are even lower: Liverpool €20m, Brighton €18m and West Ham €11m.

Aston Villa’s return to European competition is not going to generate a huge sum either, as they are currently on just €10m (participation €2.9m, UEFA coefficient €0.8m and TV pool €6.5m.

Results matter

Of course, all of the analysis to date has ignored prize money, so Newcastle could redress the balance by doing the business on the pitch. In the group stage, each win is worth €2.8m, while a draw earns €930k. There is more prize money for each additional stage reached: last 16 €9.6m, quarter-final €10.6m, semi-final €12.5m, final €15.5m and winners €20.0m. Therefore, the difference between winning and losing the final is €4.5m.

Newcastle will see good growth in their other revenue streams. Gate receipts will increase thanks to a packed St. James’ Park eagerly lapping up the prospect of elite European games, while the prospects for commercial deals and sponsorships will also be enhanced.

Clearly, Newcastle United will benefit financially from qualifying for the Champions League, which will help the club meet its FFP targets among other things. That’s good news, but the prize will not be as much as it might have been, given the way that the UEFA coefficient effectively punishes “newbies”.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog